linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
	ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
	jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com
Subject: [RFC v4 20/20] mm/spf: Clear FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE in the speculative path
Date: Fri,  9 Jun 2017 16:21:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497018069-17790-21-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497018069-17790-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The flag FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE should be unset to not allow the mmap_sem
to released in __lock_page_or_retry().

In this patch the unsetting of the flag FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is also
moved into handle_speculative_fault() since this has to be done for
all architectures.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 3 +--
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c     | 3 +--
 mm/memory.c             | 6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
index 6dd6a50f412f..4b6d0ed517ca 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
@@ -304,8 +304,7 @@ int do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
 		if (is_write)
 			flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 
-		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address,
-					 flags & ~FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY);
+		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags);
 		if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY || fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
 			goto done;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 02c0b884ca18..c62a7ea5e27b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -1366,8 +1366,7 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
 
 	if (error_code & PF_USER) {
-		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address,
-					flags & ~FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY);
+		fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags);
 
 		/*
 		 * We also check against VM_FAULT_ERROR because we have to
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 5b158549789b..35a311b0d314 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3945,7 +3945,6 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 {
 	struct vm_fault vmf = {
 		.address = address,
-		.flags = flags | FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE,
 	};
 	pgd_t *pgd;
 	p4d_t *p4d;
@@ -3954,6 +3953,10 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	int dead, seq, idx, ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 
+	/* Clear flags that may lead to release the mmap_sem to retry */
+	flags &= ~(FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY|FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE);
+	flags |= FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE;
+
 	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vma_srcu);
 	vma = find_vma_srcu(mm, address);
 	if (!vma)
@@ -4040,6 +4043,7 @@ int handle_speculative_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	vmf.pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, address);
 	vmf.gfp_mask = __get_fault_gfp_mask(vma);
 	vmf.sequence = seq;
+	vmf.flags = flags;
 
 	local_irq_enable();
 
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-09 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-09 14:20 [RFC v4 00/20] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 01/20] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 02/20] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 03/20] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 04/20] mm: VMA sequence count Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 05/20] mm: RCU free VMAs Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 06/20] mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 07/20] mm/spf: Try spin lock in speculative path Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 08/20] mm/spf: Fix fe.sequence init in __handle_mm_fault() Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 09/20] mm/spf: don't set fault entry's fields if locking failed Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [RFC v4 10/20] mm/spf; fix lock dependency against mapping->i_mmap_rwsem Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 11/20] mm/spf: Protect changes to vm_flags Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 12/20] mm/spf Protect vm_policy's changes against speculative pf Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 13/20] mm/spf: Add check on the VMA's flags Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 14/20] mm/spf: protect madvise vs speculative pf Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 15/20] mm/spf: protect mremap() against " Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 16/20] mm/spf: Don't call user fault callback in the speculative path Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 17/20] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 18/20] x86/mm: Update the handle_speculative_fault's path Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` [RFC v4 19/20] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 14:21 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2017-06-09 15:01 ` [RFC v4 00/20] Speculative page faults Michal Hocko
2017-06-09 15:25   ` Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 16:35     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-09 16:59       ` Tim Chen
2017-06-13 10:19         ` Laurent Dufour
2017-06-13  9:58       ` Laurent Dufour
2017-06-09 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-12 10:20 ` Jan Kara
2017-06-13 10:24   ` Laurent Dufour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1497018069-17790-21-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).