From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25DB6B0313 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:21:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id m5so26697870pgn.1 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.156.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2si7181832pgn.193.2017.06.09.07.21.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jun 2017 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v59EIaf1144789 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:21:25 -0400 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ayvkstcxt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:21:25 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:21:22 +0100 From: Laurent Dufour Subject: [RFC v4 03/20] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:20:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1497018069-17790-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1497018069-17790-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <1497018069-17790-4-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com This is needed because in handle_pte_fault() pte_offset_map() is called and then fe->ptl is fetched and spin_locked. This was previously embedded in the call to pte_offset_map_lock(). Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- mm/memory.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index c61042cf8b52..3cbce3762d17 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -2240,6 +2240,13 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf) pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); } +static bool pte_spinlock(struct vm_fault *vmf) +{ + vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); + spin_lock(vmf->ptl); + return true; +} + static bool pte_map_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf) { vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); @@ -3554,8 +3561,8 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) * validation through pte_unmap_same(). It's of NUMA type but * the pfn may be screwed if the read is non atomic. */ - vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); - spin_lock(vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_spinlock(vmf)) + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; if (unlikely(!pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) { pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); goto out; @@ -3747,8 +3754,8 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (pte_protnone(vmf->orig_pte) && vma_is_accessible(vmf->vma)) return do_numa_page(vmf); - vmf->ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); - spin_lock(vmf->ptl); + if (!pte_spinlock(vmf)) + return VM_FAULT_RETRY; entry = vmf->orig_pte; if (unlikely(!pte_same(*vmf->pte, entry))) goto unlock; -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org