linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/17] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:46:24 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498560384.7935.6.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498558319-32466-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 03:11 -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> Memory protection keys enable applications to protect its
> address space from inadvertent access or corruption from
> itself.
> 
> The overall idea:
> 
>  A process allocates a   key  and associates it with
>  a  address  range  within    its   address   space.
>  The process  than  can  dynamically  set read/write 
>  permissions on  the   key   without  involving  the 
>  kernel. Any  code that  violates   the  permissions
>  off the address space; as defined by its associated
>  key, will receive a segmentation fault.
> 
> This patch series enables the feature on PPC64 HPTE
> platform.
> 
> ISA3.0 section 5.7.13 describes the detailed specifications.
> 
> 
> Testing:
> 	This patch series has passed all the protection key
> 	tests available in  the selftests directory.
> 	The tests are updated to work on both x86 and powerpc.
> 
> version v4:
> 	(1) patches no more depend on the pte bits to program
> 		the hpte -- comment by Balbir
> 	(2) documentation updates
> 	(3) fixed a bug in the selftest.
> 	(4) unlike x86, powerpc lets signal handler change key
> 	    permission bits; the change will persist across
> 	    signal handler boundaries. Earlier we allowed
> 	    the signal handler to modify a field in the siginfo
> 	    structure which would than be used by the kernel
> 	    to program the key protection register (AMR)
>        		-- resolves a issue raised by Ben.
>     		"Calls to sys_swapcontext with a made-up context
> 	        will end up with a crap AMR if done by code who
> 	       	didn't know about that register".
> 	(5) these changes enable protection keys on 4k-page 
> 		kernel aswell.

I have not looked at the full series, but it seems cleaner than the original
one and the side-effect is that we can support 4k as well. Nice!

Balbir Singh.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-27 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-27 10:11 [RFC v4 00/17] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 01/17] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:54   ` Balbir Singh
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 02/17] mm: ability to disable execute permission on a key at creation Ram Pai
2017-06-27 11:32   ` Balbir Singh
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 03/17] x86: key creation with PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE disallowed Ram Pai
2017-06-27 11:32   ` Balbir Singh
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 04/17] powerpc: Implement sys_pkey_alloc and sys_pkey_free system call Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 05/17] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 06/17] powerpc: Implementation for sys_mprotect_pkey() system call Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 07/17] powerpc: make the hash functions protection-key aware Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 08/17] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 09/17] powerpc: call the hash functions with the correct pkey value Ram Pai
2017-06-27 15:24   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-28  7:12     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 10/17] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 11/17] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 12/17] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on " Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 13/17] selftest: Move protecton key selftest to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 14/17] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 15/17] Documentation: Move protecton key documentation to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 16/17] Documentation: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 17/17] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai
2017-06-28  1:50   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-27 10:46 ` Balbir Singh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1498560384.7935.6.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).