From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"gratian.crisan@ni.com" <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
Cc: "mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"julia.cartwright@ni.com" <julia.cartwright@ni.com>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"brgerst@gmail.com" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@intel.com" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"dvlasenk@redhat.com" <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"gratian@gmail.com" <gratian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel page fault in vmalloc_fault() after a preempted ioremap
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 21:43:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520548101.2693.106.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7vi1f3h.fsf@kerf.amer.corp.natinst.com>
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 14:34 -0600, Gratian Crisan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are seeing kernel page faults happening on module loads with certain
> drivers like the i915 video driver[1]. This was initially discovered on
> a 4.9 PREEMPT_RT kernel. It takes 5 days on average to reproduce using a
> simple reboot loop test. Looking at the code paths involved I believe
> the issue is still present in the latest vanilla kernel.
>
> Some relevant points are:
>
> * x86_64 CPU: Intel Atom E3940
>
> * CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is not set (which also gates CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)
>
> Based on function traces I was able to gather the sequence of events is:
>
> 1. Driver starts a ioremap operation for a region that is PMD_SIZE in
> size (or PUD_SIZE).
>
> 2. The ioremap() operation is preempted while it's in the middle of
> setting up the page mappings:
> ioremap_page_range->...->ioremap_pmd_range->pmd_set_huge <<preempted>>
>
> 3. Unrelated tasks run. Traces also include some cross core scheduling
> IPI calls.
>
> 4. Driver resumes execution finishes the ioremap operation and tries to
> access the newly mapped IO region. This triggers a vmalloc fault.
>
> 5. The vmalloc_fault() function hits a kernel page fault when trying to
> dereference a non-existent *pte_ref.
>
> The reason this happens is the code paths called from ioremap_page_range()
> make different assumptions about when a large page (pud/pmd) mapping can be
> used versus the code paths in vmalloc_fault().
>
> Using the PMD sized ioremap case as an example (the PUD case is similar):
> ioremap_pmd_range() calls ioremap_pmd_enabled() which is gated by
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP. On x86_64 this will return true unless the
> "nohugeiomap" kernel boot parameter is passed in.
>
> On the other hand, in the rare case when a page fault happens in the
> ioremap'ed region, vmalloc_fault() calls the pmd_huge() function to check
> if a PMD page is marked huge or if it should go on and get a reference to
> the PTE. However pmd_huge() is conditionally compiled based on the user
> configured CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE selected by CONFIG_HUGETLBFS. If the
> CONFIG_HUGETLBFS option is not enabled pmd_huge() is always defined to be
> 0.
>
> The end result is an OOPS in vmalloc_fault() when the non-existent pte_ref
> is dereferenced because the test for pmd_huge() failed.
>
> Commit f4eafd8bcd52 ("x86/mm: Fix vmalloc_fault() to handle large pages
> properly") attempted to fix the mismatch between ioremap() and
> vmalloc_fault() with regards to huge page handling but it missed this use
> case.
>
> I am working on a simpler reproducing case however so far I've been
> unsuccessful in re-creating the conditions that trigger the vmalloc fault
> in the first place. Adding explicit scheduling points in
> ioremap_pmd_range/pmd_set_huge doesn't seem to be sufficient. Ideas
> appreciated.
>
> Any thoughts on what a correct fix would look like? Should the ioremap
> code paths respect the HUGETLBFS config or would it be better for the
> vmalloc fault code paths to match the tests used in ioremap and not rely
> on the HUGETLBFS option being enabled?
Thanks for the report and analysis! I believe pud_large() and
pmd_large() should have been used here. I will try to reproduce the
issue and verify the fix.
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-08 20:34 Kernel page fault in vmalloc_fault() after a preempted ioremap Gratian Crisan
2018-03-08 21:43 ` Kani, Toshi [this message]
2018-03-08 22:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-08 23:08 ` Kani, Toshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520548101.2693.106.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=gratian.crisan@ni.com \
--cc=gratian@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=julia.cartwright@ni.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).