* userfaultd: Possible deadlock
@ 2019-02-06 3:12 Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2019-02-06 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-mm
Hi Christoph,
I think that a recent commit from you introduced the syzbot complaint shown
below. Can you have a look at this?
I'm referring to commit ae62c16e105a ("userfaultfd: disable irqs when taking
the waitqueue lock"). That commit went upstream in kernel v4.20.
Thanks,
Bart.
syzbot has found the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 5eeb63359b1e Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
console output: https://syzkaller-buganizer.googleplex.com/text?tag=CrashLog&id=abfb8cf5ee75596c3cec97fbca90007f7c572fd5
kernel config: https://syzkaller-buganizer.googleplex.com/text?tag=Config&id=2f236acd4d07d3e9680112eeef52906988664d3b
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=554a124791d98722a022
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
See http://go/syzbot for details on how to handle this bug.
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.0.0-rc4+ #56 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz-executor5/9727 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}, at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}, at: userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
and this task is already holding:
000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1036 [inline]
000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_read+0x27a/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&ctx->fd_wqh){....} -> (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock --> &ctx->fd_wqh --> &ctx->fault_pending_wqh
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
lock(&ctx->fd_wqh);
<Interrupt>
lock(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor5/9727:
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1036 [inline]
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){....}, at: userfaultfd_read+0x27a/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
-> (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} {
IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a5760a0>] __key.51972+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline]
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1953 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1923 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x1bd/0x580 fs/aio.c:1923
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> (&ctx->fd_wqh){....} {
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
__wake_up_common_lock+0xc7/0x190 kernel/sched/wait.c:120
__wake_up+0xe/0x10 kernel/sched/wait.c:145
userfaultfd_release+0x4f5/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:924
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a575e20>] __key.44854+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline]
__se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
__x64_sys_read+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
-> (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){+.+.} {
HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_release+0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline]
syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a575ee0>] __key.44851+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline]
__se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
__x64_sys_read+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9727 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4+ #56
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1573 [inline]
check_usage.cold+0x60f/0x940 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1605
check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1661 [inline]
check_prev_add_irq kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h:8 [inline]
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1871 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1979 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2350 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1f47/0x4700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3338
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]
userfaultfd_read+0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline]
__se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline]
__x64_sys_read+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-02-06 3:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-06 3:12 userfaultd: Possible deadlock Bart Van Assche
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).