* [PATCH 0/2] memblock: minor cleanups @ 2019-02-06 12:10 Mike Rapoport 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags Mike Rapoport 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] memblock: split checks whether a region should be skipped to a helper function Mike Rapoport 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Mike Rapoport Hi, These patches perform some minor cleanups in memblock. Generated vs mmotm-2019-02-04-17-47. Mike Rapoport (2): memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags memblock: split checks whether a region should be skipped to a helper function include/linux/memblock.h | 12 ---------- mm/memblock.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags 2019-02-06 12:10 [PATCH 0/2] memblock: minor cleanups Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-06 12:10 ` Mike Rapoport 2019-02-07 16:32 ` Souptick Joarder 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] memblock: split checks whether a region should be skipped to a helper function Mike Rapoport 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Mike Rapoport The memblock API provides dedicated helpers to set or clear a flag on a memory region, e.g. memblock_{mark,clear}_hotplug(). The memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags() functions are used only by the memblock internal function that adjusts the region flags. Drop these functions and use open-coded implementation instead. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> --- include/linux/memblock.h | 12 ------------ mm/memblock.c | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index 71c9e32..32a9a6b 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -317,18 +317,6 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone, for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, &memblock.reserved, \ nid, flags, p_start, p_end, p_nid) -static inline void memblock_set_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r, - enum memblock_flags flags) -{ - r->flags |= flags; -} - -static inline void memblock_clear_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r, - enum memblock_flags flags) -{ - r->flags &= ~flags; -} - #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP int memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, struct memblock_type *type, int nid); diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 0151a5b..af5fe8e 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -851,11 +851,14 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base, if (ret) return ret; - for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) + for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) { + struct memblock_region *r = &type->regions[i]; + if (set) - memblock_set_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag); + r->flags |= flag; else - memblock_clear_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag); + r->flags &= ~flag; + } memblock_merge_regions(type); return 0; -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-07 16:32 ` Souptick Joarder 2019-02-08 10:04 ` Mike Rapoport 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Souptick Joarder @ 2019-02-07 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Rapoport; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Michal Hocko, Linux-MM, linux-kernel On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:01 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > The memblock API provides dedicated helpers to set or clear a flag on a > memory region, e.g. memblock_{mark,clear}_hotplug(). > > The memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags() functions are used only by the > memblock internal function that adjusts the region flags. > Drop these functions and use open-coded implementation instead. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > --- > include/linux/memblock.h | 12 ------------ > mm/memblock.c | 9 ++++++--- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index 71c9e32..32a9a6b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -317,18 +317,6 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone, > for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, &memblock.reserved, \ > nid, flags, p_start, p_end, p_nid) > > -static inline void memblock_set_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r, > - enum memblock_flags flags) > -{ > - r->flags |= flags; > -} > - > -static inline void memblock_clear_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r, > - enum memblock_flags flags) > -{ > - r->flags &= ~flags; > -} > - > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP > int memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, > struct memblock_type *type, int nid); > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 0151a5b..af5fe8e 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -851,11 +851,14 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) > + for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) { > + struct memblock_region *r = &type->regions[i]; Is it fine if we drop this memblock_region *r altogether ? > + > if (set) > - memblock_set_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag); > + r->flags |= flag; > else > - memblock_clear_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag); > + r->flags &= ~flag; > + } > > memblock_merge_regions(type); > return 0; > -- > 2.7.4 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags 2019-02-07 16:32 ` Souptick Joarder @ 2019-02-08 10:04 ` Mike Rapoport 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-08 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souptick Joarder; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Michal Hocko, Linux-MM, linux-kernel On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:02:24PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:01 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > The memblock API provides dedicated helpers to set or clear a flag on a > > memory region, e.g. memblock_{mark,clear}_hotplug(). > > > > The memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags() functions are used only by the > > memblock internal function that adjusts the region flags. > > Drop these functions and use open-coded implementation instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > > --- > > include/linux/memblock.h | 12 ------------ > > mm/memblock.c | 9 ++++++--- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > > index 71c9e32..32a9a6b 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > > @@ -317,18 +317,6 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone, > > for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, &memblock.reserved, \ > > nid, flags, p_start, p_end, p_nid) > > > > -static inline void memblock_set_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r, > > - enum memblock_flags flags) > > -{ > > - r->flags |= flags; > > -} > > - > > -static inline void memblock_clear_region_flags(struct memblock_region *r, > > - enum memblock_flags flags) > > -{ > > - r->flags &= ~flags; > > -} > > - > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP > > int memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, > > struct memblock_type *type, int nid); > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > > index 0151a5b..af5fe8e 100644 > > --- a/mm/memblock.c > > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > > @@ -851,11 +851,14 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base, > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) > > + for (i = start_rgn; i < end_rgn; i++) { > > + struct memblock_region *r = &type->regions[i]; > > Is it fine if we drop this memblock_region *r altogether ? I prefer using a local variable to type->regions[i].flags > > + > > if (set) > > - memblock_set_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag); > > + r->flags |= flag; > > else > > - memblock_clear_region_flags(&type->regions[i], flag); > > + r->flags &= ~flag; > > + } > > > > memblock_merge_regions(type); > > return 0; > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] memblock: split checks whether a region should be skipped to a helper function 2019-02-06 12:10 [PATCH 0/2] memblock: minor cleanups Mike Rapoport 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-06 12:10 ` Mike Rapoport 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mike Rapoport @ 2019-02-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Mike Rapoport The __next_mem_range() and __next_mem_range_rev() duplucate the code that checks whether a region should be skipped because of node or flags incompatibility. Split this code into a helper function. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> --- mm/memblock.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index af5fe8e..f87d3ae 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -958,6 +958,29 @@ void __init_memblock __next_reserved_mem_region(u64 *idx, *idx = ULLONG_MAX; } +static bool should_skip_region(struct memblock_region *m, int nid, int flags) +{ + int m_nid = memblock_get_region_node(m); + + /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ + if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid != m_nid) + return true; + + /* skip hotpluggable memory regions if needed */ + if (movable_node_is_enabled() && memblock_is_hotpluggable(m)) + return true; + + /* if we want mirror memory skip non-mirror memory regions */ + if ((flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR) && !memblock_is_mirror(m)) + return true; + + /* skip nomap memory unless we were asked for it explicitly */ + if (!(flags & MEMBLOCK_NOMAP) && memblock_is_nomap(m)) + return true; + + return false; +} + /** * __next__mem_range - next function for for_each_free_mem_range() etc. * @idx: pointer to u64 loop variable @@ -1005,20 +1028,7 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, phys_addr_t m_end = m->base + m->size; int m_nid = memblock_get_region_node(m); - /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ - if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid != m_nid) - continue; - - /* skip hotpluggable memory regions if needed */ - if (movable_node_is_enabled() && memblock_is_hotpluggable(m)) - continue; - - /* if we want mirror memory skip non-mirror memory regions */ - if ((flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR) && !memblock_is_mirror(m)) - continue; - - /* skip nomap memory unless we were asked for it explicitly */ - if (!(flags & MEMBLOCK_NOMAP) && memblock_is_nomap(m)) + if (should_skip_region(m, nid, flags)) continue; if (!type_b) { @@ -1122,20 +1132,7 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid, phys_addr_t m_end = m->base + m->size; int m_nid = memblock_get_region_node(m); - /* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */ - if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid != m_nid) - continue; - - /* skip hotpluggable memory regions if needed */ - if (movable_node_is_enabled() && memblock_is_hotpluggable(m)) - continue; - - /* if we want mirror memory skip non-mirror memory regions */ - if ((flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR) && !memblock_is_mirror(m)) - continue; - - /* skip nomap memory unless we were asked for it explicitly */ - if (!(flags & MEMBLOCK_NOMAP) && memblock_is_nomap(m)) + if (should_skip_region(m, nid, flags)) continue; if (!type_b) { -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-08 10:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-02-06 12:10 [PATCH 0/2] memblock: minor cleanups Mike Rapoport 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] memblock: remove memblock_{set,clear}_region_flags Mike Rapoport 2019-02-07 16:32 ` Souptick Joarder 2019-02-08 10:04 ` Mike Rapoport 2019-02-06 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] memblock: split checks whether a region should be skipped to a helper function Mike Rapoport
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).