From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFCCC432C2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3002F207E0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="mV2a0Lj8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3002F207E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lca.pw Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B5D716B0270; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:21:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B0F266B0272; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:21:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9FC1C6B0274; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:21:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0104.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.104]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798B66B0270 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:21:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 01751181AC9C4 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:21:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75974259564.22.brush50_606e150f2cd4e X-HE-Tag: brush50_606e150f2cd4e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 7243 Received: from mail-qk1-f195.google.com (mail-qk1-f195.google.com [209.85.222.195]) by imf36.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 201so6076114qkd.13 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:21:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OqdsyaKXCfoJ/CepAN7ZnMb70xE+owdC/EL8zMyvqWA=; b=mV2a0Lj8ktafYucfrIJrN9WzUmJu7o58I+olp86jqwBq4C6sU66DtjG0hr60zEk6kD rXdBW0JAVgrtzZIPTbUJJP/kAsENruKi8STsbptJ0k41qLTKrVhwtDokrXblmmfvWVDc nz5Rtp31C+beUQ3VWeOi1ksSeoJYqjeYlnDugWxHKqQC5g11Kll8XnmT9D1L4SLSoPs8 SAlUFKMZM/mkqihoANGtjcXrULzOgXPFWGy0YiXTuO6GkZiMuuq8/dA8bTpItoWu0gZU Xq8wVDWPnx2a+NX6uKawyEwRC8SIkEG1VXNM5DWXgtl+U3ZOzYhszuKIhZZAxpsXIW6S ooCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OqdsyaKXCfoJ/CepAN7ZnMb70xE+owdC/EL8zMyvqWA=; b=kbwgDDiTokJpHs2LVpluf+E4Bsr2N0dR4xvMgzFTKU1EXfQOOsOc57JInVN1rgjjgJ Pp8xhd35uR+FIImxAZXXLItkidaGSnF0wqvYvTncqXO0B1Tn89m3MSumjwyjIcX/xq4I eAqyaRVeXCWBV5dx7Y5IIF38r8/nYDGKuwYhwjznFeekngdpTrWeZlviCbOcVGlSYu5w rfKflyzFY2zgRlc5TWm485d7id2xfwGq+H2O9qNeldg4PvlyjWt7DsvhZ1J1hVz9Famp jWk/jrRrkgCUHhNarO5y57hEcAEwX1vYxPQTBF/TQPqEY5heYzsESdhhet9CILw/jPct KPLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWV+Uq+WtANVUq/IXI70nVoGDDmwYtkijEDWf+UGiq+ZF0qfXb4 b9CbUixgGQjC7M3w50SC/TQtng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlAqfVULUi4QnAQ01S52UvcGMDocFgP2CZYiMGlGYS0XzcYwiB1XxRYfAS82bJl7vg0CuikQ== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e30a:: with SMTP id v10mr5221747qkf.369.1569435661633; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-41-57.bos.redhat.com (nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com. [66.187.233.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f27sm2889583qkh.42.2019.09.25.11.21.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1569435659.5576.227.camel@lca.pw> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't take the cpu_hotplug_lock From: Qian Cai To: Michal Hocko Cc: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Pavel Tatashin , Dan Williams , Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:20:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190925174809.GM23050@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190924143615.19628-1-david@redhat.com> <1569337401.5576.217.camel@lca.pw> <20190924151147.GB23050@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1569351244.5576.219.camel@lca.pw> <2f8c8099-8de0-eccc-2056-a79d2f97fbf7@redhat.com> <1569427262.5576.225.camel@lca.pw> <20190925174809.GM23050@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 19:48 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 25-09-19 12:01:02, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 09:02 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 24.09.19 20:54, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > On Tue 24-09-19 11:03:21, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > While at it, it might be a good time to rethink the whole loc= king over there, as > > > > > > it right now read files under /sys/kernel/slab/ could trigger= a possible > > > > > > deadlock anyway. > > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > [...] > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.452090][ T5224] -> #0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_s= em){++++}: > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.459748][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0validate_chain+0xd10/0x2bcc > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.464883][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0__lock_acquire+0x7f4/0xb8c > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.469930][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.474803][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0get_online_mems+0x54/0x150 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.479850][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0show_slab_objects+0x94/0x3a8 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.485072][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0total_objects_show+0x28/0x34 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.490292][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0slab_attr_show+0x38/0x54 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.495166][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x198/0x2d4 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.500473][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xcc > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.505433][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0seq_read+0x30c/0x8a8 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.509958][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0kernfs_fop_read+0xa8/0x314 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.515007][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0__vfs_read+0x88/0x20c > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.519620][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0vfs_read+0xd8/0x10c > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.524060][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0ksys_read+0xb0/0x120 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.528586][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0__arm64_sys_read+0x54/0x88 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.533634][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240 > > > > > > [=C2=A0=C2=A0442.538768][ T5224]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0el0_svc+0x8/0xc > > > > >=20 > > > > > I believe the lock is not really needed here. We do not dealloc= ated > > > > > pgdat of a hotremoved node nor destroy the slab state because a= n > > > > > existing slabs would prevent hotremove to continue in the first= place. > > > > >=20 > > > > > There are likely details to be checked of course but the lock j= ust seems > > > > > bogus. > > > >=20 > > > > Check 03afc0e25f7f ("slab: get_online_mems for > > > > kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink}"). It actually talk about the = races during > > > > memory as well cpu hotplug, so it might even that cpu_hotplug_loc= k removal is > > > > problematic? > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Which removal are you referring to? get_online_mems() does not mess= with > > > the cpu hotplug lock (and therefore this patch). > >=20 > > The one in your patch. I suspect there might be races among the whole= NUMA node > > hotplug, kmem_cache_create, and show_slab_objects(). See bfc8c90139eb= ("mem- > > hotplug: implement get/put_online_mems") > >=20 > > "kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink} need to get a stable value of cpu= /node > > online mask, because they init/destroy/access per-cpu/node kmem_cache= parts, > > which can be allocated or destroyed on cpu/mem hotplug." >=20 > I still have to grasp that code but if the slub allocator really needs > a stable cpu mask then it should be using the explicit cpu hotplug > locking rather than rely on side effect of memory hotplug locking. >=20 > > Both online_pages() and show_slab_objects() need to get a stable valu= e of > > cpu/node online mask. >=20 > Could tou be more specific why online_pages need a stable cpu online > mask? I do not think that show_slab_objects is a real problem because a > potential race shouldn't be critical. build_all_zonelists() __build_all_zonelists() for_each_online_cpu(cpu)