From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,linux-mm@kvack.org,sashal@kernel.org,willy@infradead.org,yangyingliang@huawei.com,zhongjiang@huawei.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning." has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:00:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574139603151166@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191118032610.182862-2-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning.
to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
memfd-use-radix_tree_deref_slot_protected-to-avoid-the-warning.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From zhongjiang@huawei.com Tue Nov 19 05:56:14 2019
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:26:08 +0800
Subject: memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning.
To: <sashal@kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20191118032610.182862-2-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
The commit 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins")
introduces the following warning messages.
*WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in memfd_wait_for_pins*
It is because we still use radix_tree_deref_slot without read_rcu_lock.
We should use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected instead in the case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 99b45e7a1ba1 ("memfd: Fix locking when tagging pins")
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/memfd.c
+++ b/mm/memfd.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void memfd_tag_pins(struct addres
xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->i_pages, &iter, start) {
- page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot);
+ page = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &mapping->i_pages.xa_lock);
if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) {
if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) {
slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from zhongjiang@huawei.com are
queue-4.19/misc-genwqe-should-return-proper-error-value.patch
queue-4.19/arm-at91-pm-call-put_device-instead-of-of_node_put-i.patch
queue-4.19/coresight-use-err_cast-instead-of-err_ptr.patch
queue-4.19/memfd-use-radix_tree_deref_slot_protected-to-avoid-the-warning.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-18 3:26 [PATCH 4.14] memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning zhong jiang
2019-11-18 3:26 ` [PATCH 4.19] " zhong jiang
2019-11-18 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-19 5:00 ` gregkh [this message]
2019-11-18 3:26 ` [PATCH 4.4] " zhong jiang
2019-11-18 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-19 4:59 ` Patch "memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning." has been added to the 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2019-11-18 3:26 ` [PATCH 4.9] memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning zhong jiang
2019-11-18 12:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-19 4:59 ` Patch "memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning." has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2019-11-18 12:24 ` [PATCH 4.14] memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-19 4:59 ` Patch "memfd: Use radix_tree_deref_slot_protected to avoid the warning." has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1574139603151166@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).