Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] x86: use exit_lazy_tlb rather than membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode

Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-16T16:03:20Z

----- On Jul 16, 2020, at 11:46 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:

> ----- On Jul 16, 2020, at 12:42 AM, Nicholas Piggin npiggin@gmail.com wrote:
>> I should be more complete here, especially since I was complaining
>> about unclear barrier comment :)
>>
>>
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> a. user stuff 1. user stuff
>> b. membarrier() 2. enter kernel
>> c. smp_mb() 3. smp_mb__after_spinlock(); // in __schedule
>> d. read rq->curr 4. rq->curr switched to kthread
>> e. is kthread, skip IPI 5. switch_to kthread
>> f. return to user 6. rq->curr switched to user thread
>> g. user stuff 7. switch_to user thread
>> 8. exit kernel
>> 9. more user stuff
>>
>> What you're really ordering is a, g vs 1, 9 right?
>>
>> In other words, 9 must see a if it sees g, g must see 1 if it saw 9,
>> etc.
>>
>> Userspace does not care where the barriers are exactly or what kernel
>> memory accesses might be being ordered by them, so long as there is a
>> mb somewhere between a and g, and 1 and 9. Right?
>
> This is correct.

Actually, sorry, the above is not quite right. It's been a while
since I looked into the details of membarrier.

The smp_mb() at the beginning of membarrier() needs to be paired with a
smp_mb() _after_ rq->curr is switched back to the user thread, so the
memory barrier is between store to rq->curr and following user-space
accesses.

The smp_mb() at the end of membarrier() needs to be paired with the
smp_mb__after_spinlock() at the beginning of schedule, which is
between accesses to userspace memory and switching rq->curr to kthread.

As to *why* this ordering is needed, I'd have to dig through additional
scenarios from https://lwn.net/Articles/573436/. Or maybe Paul remembers ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

> Note that the accesses to user-space memory can be
> done either by user-space code or kernel code, it doesn't matter.
> However, in order to be considered as happening before/after
> either membarrier or the matching compiler barrier, kernel code
> needs to have causality relationship with user-space execution,
> e.g. user-space does a system call, or returns from a system call.
>
> In the case of io_uring, submitting a request or returning from waiting
> on request completion appear to provide this causality relationship.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.