linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	ying.huang@intel.com, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [v2 PATCH 3/3] mm/mempolicy: unify the parameter sanity check for mbind and set_mempolicy
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 22:07:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1622210823-61911-4-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622210823-61911-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>

Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost
the same operation for parameter sanity check.

Add a helper function to unify the code to reduce the redundancy,
and make it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future.

[thanks to David Rientjes for suggesting using helper function
instead of macro]

Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index f9ab05b..e5a3e5e 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1467,26 +1467,37 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode,
 	return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0;
 }
 
+static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags)
+{
+	*flags = *mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
+	*mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
+	if ((unsigned int)(*mode) >= MPOL_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
 			 unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask,
 			 unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags)
 {
+	unsigned short mode_flags;
 	nodemask_t nodes;
+	int lmode = mode;
 	int err;
-	unsigned short mode_flags;
 
 	start = untagged_addr(start);
-	mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
-	mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
-	if (mode >= MPOL_MAX)
-		return -EINVAL;
-	if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) &&
-	    (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = sanitize_mpol_flags(&lmode, &mode_flags);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
-	return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags);
+
+	return do_mbind(start, len, lmode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags);
 }
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len,
@@ -1500,20 +1511,20 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len,
 static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask,
 				 unsigned long maxnode)
 {
-	int err;
+	unsigned short mode_flags;
 	nodemask_t nodes;
-	unsigned short flags;
+	int lmode = mode;
+	int err;
+
+	err = sanitize_mpol_flags(&lmode, &mode_flags);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
-	flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
-	mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
-	if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX)
-		return -EINVAL;
-	if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
-		return -EINVAL;
 	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
-	return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes);
+
+	return do_set_mempolicy(lmode, mode_flags, &nodes);
 }
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask,
-- 
2.7.4



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-28 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-28 14:07 [v2 PATCH 0/3] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup Feng Tang
2021-05-28 14:07 ` [v2 PATCH 1/3] mm/mempolicy: cleanup nodemask intersection check for oom Feng Tang
2021-05-28 14:07 ` [v2 PATCH 2/3] mm/mempolicy: don't handle MPOL_LOCAL like a fake MPOL_PREFERRED policy Feng Tang
2021-05-28 14:07 ` Feng Tang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1622210823-61911-4-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com \
    --to=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).