Re: [RFC][patch 0/2] mm: remove PageReserved

Daniel Phillips
2005-08-09T20:52:38Z

On Wednesday 10 August 2005 06:17, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> There might be a case for packaging repeated arguments into structures
> (though several of these levels are inlined anyway), but that's some
> other exercise entirely, shouldn't get in the way of removing Reserved.

Agreed, an entirely separate question that I'd like to return to in time. The
existing herd of page table walkers is unnecessarily repetitious.

Regards,

Daniel