Re: [RFC 1/6] mm, thp: introduce thp zero subpages reclaim

ning zhang
2021-10-29T12:16:49Z

在 2021/10/28 下午8:53, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:56:50PM +0800, Ning Zhang wrote:
>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> @@ -185,6 +185,15 @@ unsigned long thp_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
>> void free_transhuge_page(struct page *page);
>> bool is_transparent_hugepage(struct page *page);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>> +int zsr_get_hpage(struct hpage_reclaim *hr_queue, struct page **reclaim_page);
>> +unsigned long zsr_reclaim_hpage(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct page *page);
>> +static inline struct list_head *hpage_reclaim_list(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + return &page[3].hpage_reclaim_list;
>> +}
>> +#endif
> I don't think any of this needs to be under an ifdef. That goes for a
> lot of your other additions to header files.
>
>> @@ -1110,6 +1121,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>> gfp_t gfp_mask,
>> unsigned long *total_scanned);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> +void del_hpage_from_queue(struct page *page);
>> +#endif
> That name is too generic. Also, to avoid ifdefs in code, it should be:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> void del_hpage_from_queue(struct page *page);
> #else
> static inline void del_hpage_from_queue(struct page *page) { }
> #endif
>
>> @@ -159,6 +159,12 @@ struct page {
>> /* For both global and memcg */
>> struct list_head deferred_list;
>> };
>> + struct { /* Third tail page of compound page */
>> + unsigned long _compound_pad_2;
>> + unsigned long _compound_pad_3;
>> + /* For zero subpages reclaim */
>> + struct list_head hpage_reclaim_list;
> Why do you need _compound_pad_3 here?
>
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -787,6 +787,12 @@ struct deferred_split {
>> struct list_head split_queue;
>> unsigned long split_queue_len;
>> };
>> +
>> +struct hpage_reclaim {
>> + spinlock_t reclaim_queue_lock;
>> + struct list_head reclaim_queue;
>> + unsigned long reclaim_queue_len;
>> +};
> Have you considered using an XArray instead of a linked list?
>
>> +static bool hpage_estimate_zero(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int i, maybe_zero_pages = 0, offset = 0;
>> + void *addr;
>> +
>> +#define BYTES_PER_LONG (BITS_PER_LONG / BITS_PER_BYTE)
> BYTES_PER_LONG is simply sizeof(long).
> Also, I'd check the entire cacheline rather than just one word; it's
> essentially free.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>> +#define ZSR_PG_MLOCK(flag) (1UL << flag)
>> +#else
>> +#define ZSR_PG_MLOCK(flag) 0
>> +#endif
> Or use __PG_MLOCKED ?
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_PG_UNCACHED
>> +#define ZSR_PG_UNCACHED(flag) (1UL << flag)
>> +#else
>> +#define ZSR_PG_UNCACHED(flag) 0
>> +#endif
> Define __PG_UNCACHED in page-flags.h?
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>> +#define ZSR_PG_HWPOISON(flag) (1UL << flag)
>> +#else
>> +#define ZSR_PG_HWPOISON(flag) 0
>> +#endif
> __PG_HWPOISON
>
>> +#define hr_queue_list_to_page(head) \
>> + compound_head(list_entry((head)->prev, struct page,\
>> + hpage_reclaim_list))
> I think you're better off subtracting 3*sizeof(struct page) than
> loading from compound_head.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> +/* Need the page lock if the page is not a newly allocated page. */
>> +static void add_hpage_to_queue(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> + struct hpage_reclaim *hr_queue;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + if (READ_ONCE(memcg->thp_reclaim) == THP_RECLAIM_DISABLE)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + page = compound_head(page);
> Why do you think the caller might be passing in a tail page here?

Thanks for the comments!  I will modify it.