linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"dborkman@redhat.com" <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"imbrenda@linux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"mbenes@suse.cz" <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 0/4] vmalloc: bpf: introduce VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:47:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1650533246.j8team32e9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiQ5=S3m2+xRbm-1H8fuQwWfQxnO7tHhKg8FjegxzdVaQ@mail.gmail.com>

Excerpts from Linus Torvalds's message of April 21, 2022 3:48 pm:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:25 PM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why not just revert fac54e2bfb5b ?
> 
> That would be stupid, with no sane way forward.

Oh I missed this comment. Now I'm completely confused. Reverting the
patch which caused the breakage *is* the sane way forward. Your tree
is not broken after that so you're done.

And if x86 wanted to select HUGE_VMALLOC in future then it can do so
after fixing the issues it has with it, so that's that the sane way
forward for that.

What you have now is what's insane. HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC now means
"you can ask for huge pages but it might crash in undocumented 
arch-specific circumstances so good luck".

Thanks,
Nick


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-21  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-15 16:44 [PATCH v4 bpf 0/4] vmalloc: bpf: introduce VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP Song Liu
2022-04-15 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 1/4] vmalloc: replace VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP Song Liu
2022-04-15 17:43   ` Rik van Riel
2022-04-15 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 2/4] page_alloc: use vmalloc_huge for large system hash Song Liu
2022-04-15 17:43   ` Rik van Riel
2022-04-25  7:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-04-25  8:17       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-25  8:24         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-04-15 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 3/4] module: introduce module_alloc_huge Song Liu
2022-04-15 18:06   ` Rik van Riel
2022-06-16 16:10   ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-15 16:44 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 4/4] bpf: use module_alloc_huge for bpf_prog_pack Song Liu
2022-04-15 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 0/4] vmalloc: bpf: introduce VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16  1:34   ` Song Liu
2022-04-16  1:42     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16  1:43       ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-16  5:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-16 19:55     ` Song Liu
2022-04-16 20:30       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-16 22:26         ` Song Liu
2022-04-18 10:06           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-19  0:44             ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-19  1:56               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-19  5:36                 ` Song Liu
2022-04-19 18:42                   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-19 19:20                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-20  2:03                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-04-20  2:18                         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-20 14:42                           ` Song Liu
2022-04-20 18:28                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-21  7:29                             ` Song Liu
2022-04-21  3:25                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21  5:48                         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-21  6:02                           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-21  9:07                             ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21  8:57                           ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 15:44                             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-21 23:30                               ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22  0:49                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22  1:51                                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22  2:31                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22  2:57                                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21 15:47                             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-21 16:15                               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22  0:12                                 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22  2:29                                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22  2:47                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-22 16:54                                       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22  3:08                                     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22  4:31                                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-22 17:10                                         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22 20:22                                           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-22  3:33                                     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-21  9:47                           ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2022-04-19 21:24                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-04-19 23:58                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-04-20  7:58                   ` Petr Mladek
2022-04-19 18:20               ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-24 17:43       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-04-25  6:48         ` Song Liu
2022-04-21  3:19     ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1650533246.j8team32e9.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).