linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
To: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] remove vm_struct list management
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:41:39 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1672785544.45808556.1355236899164.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4NHO=y=utmK_at+JxvyYMd4O_7W_6n541GEA0aeDfukyw@mail.gmail.com>



----- Original Message -----

> > Can we get the same information from this rb-tree of vmap_area? Is
> > ->va_start field communication same information as vmlist was
> > communicating? What's the difference between vmap_area_root and vmlist.
> 
> Thanks for comment.
> 
> Yes. vmap_area's va_start field represent same information as vm_struct's addr.
> vmap_area_root is data structure for fast searching an area.
> vmap_area_list is address sorted list, so we can use it like as vmlist.
> 
> There is a little difference vmap_area_list and vmlist.
> vmlist is lack of information about some areas in vmalloc address space.
> For example, vm_map_ram() allocate area in vmalloc address space,
> but it doesn't make a link with vmlist. To provide full information
> about vmalloc address space, using vmap_area_list is more adequate.
> 
> > So without knowing details of both the data structures, I think if vmlist
> > is going away, then user space tools should be able to traverse vmap_area_root
> > rb tree. I am assuming it is sorted using ->addr field and we should be
> > able to get vmalloc area start from there. It will just be a matter of
> > exporting right fields to user space (instead of vmlist).
> 
> There is address sorted list of vmap_area, vmap_area_list.
> So we can use it for traversing vmalloc areas if it is necessary.
> But, as I mentioned before, kexec write *just* address of vmlist and
> offset of vm_struct's address field.  It imply that they don't traverse vmlist,
> because they didn't write vm_struct's next field which is needed for traversing.
> Without vm_struct's next field, they have no method for traversing.
> So, IMHO, assigning dummy vm_struct to vmlist which is implemented by [7/8] is
> a safe way to maintain a compatibility of userspace tool. :)

Why bother keeping vmlist around?  kdump's makedumpfile command would not
even need to traverse the vmap_area rbtree, because it could simply look
at the first vmap_area in the sorted vmap_area_list, correct?

Dave Anderson


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-11 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-06 16:09 [RFC PATCH 0/8] remove vm_struct list management Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm, vmalloc: change iterating a vmlist to find_vm_area() Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-07  7:44   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-12-07  8:15     ` Bob Liu
2012-12-07 13:40     ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-12-10  5:20   ` guanxuetao
2012-12-10 15:13   ` Chris Metcalf
2013-01-24 15:50   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm, vmalloc: move get_vmalloc_info() to vmalloc.c Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm, vmalloc: protect va->vm by vmap_area_lock Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm, vmalloc: iterate vmap_area_list, instead of vmlist in vread/vwrite() Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm, vmalloc: iterate vmap_area_list in get_vmalloc_info() Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm, vmalloc: iterate vmap_area_list, instead of vmlist, in vmallocinfo() Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm, vmalloc: makes vmlist only for kexec Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm, vmalloc: remove list management operation after initializing vmalloc Joonsoo Kim
2012-12-06 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] remove vm_struct list management Andrew Morton
2012-12-07 13:05   ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-12-06 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-07 13:16   ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-12-07 14:59     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-10 14:40       ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-12-11 14:41         ` Dave Anderson [this message]
2012-12-11 21:48         ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-11 22:17           ` Dave Anderson
2012-12-12  5:56             ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-12-12 14:10               ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-12-07  3:37 ` Bob Liu
2012-12-07 13:35   ` JoonSoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1672785544.45808556.1355236899164.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
    --to=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).