From: zhangchun <zhang.chuna@h3c.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<jiaoxupo@h3c.com>, <zhang.zhengming@h3c.com>,
<zhang.zhansheng@h3c.com>, <shaohaojize@126.com>,
zhangchun <zhang.chuna@h3c.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix kmap_high deadlock V2
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:56:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1719903369-35385-1-git-send-email-zhang.chuna@h3c.com> (raw)
I work with zhangzhansheng(from h3c) find that some situation
may casue deadlock when we use kmap_high and kmap_XXX or kumap_xxx
between differt cores at the same time, kmap_high->map_new_virtual->
flush_all_zero_pkmaps->flush_tlb_kernel_range->on_each_cpu. On this
condition, kmap_high hold the kmap_lock,wait the other cores respond
to ipi. But the others may disable irq and wait kmap_lock,
this is some deadlock condition. I think it's necessary to give
kmap_lock before call flush_tlb_kernel_range.
Like this:
spin_unlock(&kmap_lock);
flush_tlb_kernel_range(xxx);
spin_lock(&kmap_lock);
CPU 0: cpu 1:
kmap_xxx() {
xxx irq_disable();
kmap_high(); spin_lock(&kmap_lock)
xxx yyyyyyy
spin_unlock(&kmap_lock)
irq_enable();
}
kmap_high detail:
kmap_high() {
zzz
spin_lock(&kmap_lock)
map_new_virtual->
flush_all_zero_pkmaps->
flush_tlb_kernel_range->
on_each_cpu
/*
if cpu 1 irq_disabled, the cpu 1
cannot ack, then cpu 0 and cpu 1 may hangup.
*/
spin_unlock(&kmap_lock)
zzz
}
Signed-off-by: zhangchun <zhang.chuna@h3c.com>
Reviewed-by: zhangzhengming <zhang.zhengming@h3c.com>
---
mm/highmem.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/highmem.c b/mm/highmem.c
index bd48ba4..841b370 100644
--- a/mm/highmem.c
+++ b/mm/highmem.c
@@ -220,8 +220,11 @@ static void flush_all_zero_pkmaps(void)
set_page_address(page, NULL);
need_flush = 1;
}
- if (need_flush)
+ if (need_flush) {
+ spin_unlock(&kmap_lock);
flush_tlb_kernel_range(PKMAP_ADDR(0), PKMAP_ADDR(LAST_PKMAP));
+ spin_lock(&kmap_lock);
+ }
}
void __kmap_flush_unused(void)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-02 6:56 zhangchun [this message]
2024-07-02 11:37 ` [PATCH] mm: fix kmap_high deadlock V2 Markus Elfring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-02 4:26 Zhangchun
2024-07-02 5:02 ` thington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1719903369-35385-1-git-send-email-zhang.chuna@h3c.com \
--to=zhang.chuna@h3c.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiaoxupo@h3c.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shaohaojize@126.com \
--cc=zhang.zhansheng@h3c.com \
--cc=zhang.zhengming@h3c.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).