From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D9EC433E1 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C75B21534 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Kfthxle0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C75B21534 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DF4576B0082; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DA3D06B0085; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:12:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CB9268D000C; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:12:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0099.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.99]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74AF6B0082 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780312C7C for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:12:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76993779156.16.worm26_4c0b8f926e8a Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388DC100E690B for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:12:18 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: worm26_4c0b8f926e8a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2255 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by imf37.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:12:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=hur0N5VpFMmM468rLQSCnKTmOlrtSai0qkItfn7CRWk=; b=Kfthxle0FEk7pd724y1qHveQfR sdJpKjuapDo5PSA172fvIzxsRAt6Bd+2KaFFmiXG6rHn08cuGyizbIwpkf7d5cTdH8ABqZc7v9X0x hoOAfY5S0065hvgTmsMliIzNzxXxU6pkpS7r6kV52x1VUVsfVn0OgvuSDoujxyr2MaSHklloY7uFh Yo/WA4vsUvPGK/lDlzyeCoRoMo3vkSG1ghbxB84yFE07X2x0zovViBCPF02WCqXWmgZ3mMpfZ6zSa +ZgsBHb8E8K8O9ANHdWU0VRAiHnfHOCNxQ3/V63Vd+DrDbi7y80hYVwA3isHDASZIbm0ay6lrliHG 9VTtNWhA==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::19c2] by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jr2kt-00086U-SZ; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:12:12 +0000 To: Linux MM , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Wolfram Sang , Andrew Morton From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Documentation (mm & i2c) questions (doubled words) Message-ID: <187c35da-041e-dcf3-d14e-7046f57d0606@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:12:06 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 388DC100E690B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: for MM: in Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst: line 132-133: If that directory is not present, the system either does not not provide a memory-side cache, or that information is not accessible to the kernel. Is the double negative done on purpose or is it a typo/mistake? for I2C: in Documentation/i2c/upgrading-clients.rst: line 10-11: This guide outlines how to alter existing Linux 2.6 client drivers from the old to the new new binding methods. ^^^^^^^ Is this like "really new" or newer than new? or just a simple mistake? thanks. -- ~Randy