From: sunil bhargo <marx_bhargav@yahoo.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "mounesh.b@gmail.com" <mounesh.b@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for clarification regarding huge pages and remapping of virtual to physical address
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:09:35 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1998899028.91244.1713348575745@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8973aa-4936-4114-9baa-6319f048dc15@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]
David,Thanks for your response. So if i get it right then reserving the memory at boot time with/without the huge page, the page migration can happen ?
Thanks,Sunil Bhargo
On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 02:47:30 PM GMT+5:30, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
On 17.04.24 11:11, sunil bhargo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have an application which relies on virtual address to physical
> address mapping to remain static. The buffer is allocated using
> malloc. It is in user space and we were using the mlock thinking that as
> it would prevent the swapping the va->pa address mapping would be
> static. But it seems to be a faulty assumption.
>
> If the memory is allocated from huge pages by reserving space upfront at
> the kernel boot up and then mmap’ing using MAP_HUGETLB, is it assured
> that virtual address to physical mapping won’t be remapped and will be
> static ?
Unless you have a kernel that has page migration disabled, no.
You could use secretmem (which is currently not migratabale/swappable/
...), but that has very limited capabilities.
A "hack" would be to register that (ordinary) memory using iouring as a
fixed buffer. That way, it will be longterm pinned and can neither get
migrated nor swapped out.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2789 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <245378552.87900.1713345083646.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2024-04-17 9:11 ` Request for clarification regarding huge pages and remapping of virtual to physical address sunil bhargo
2024-04-17 9:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-17 10:09 ` sunil bhargo [this message]
2024-04-17 15:00 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1998899028.91244.1713348575745@mail.yahoo.com \
--to=marx_bhargav@yahoo.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mounesh.b@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).