From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 1/3] mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:31:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a77f16b-d637-40b4-bf47-a8236729a0ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00721702-78FF-4690-8EAA-31C367FA9FC0@nvidia.com>
On 19.11.24 17:12, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2024, at 10:29, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>>> +/* Split a multi-block free page into its individual pageblocks. */
>>> +static void split_large_buddy(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>>> + unsigned long pfn, int order, fpi_t fpi)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long end = pfn + (1 << order);
>>> +
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order));
>>> + /* Caller removed page from freelist, buddy info cleared! */
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageBuddy(page));
>>> +
>>> + if (order > pageblock_order)
>>> + order = pageblock_order;
>>> +
>>> + while (pfn != end) {
>>> + int mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
>>> +
>>> + __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, mt, fpi);
>>> + pfn += 1 << order;
>>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> stumbling over this while digging through the code ....
>>
>>> +
>>> static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
>>> unsigned long pfn, unsigned int order,
>>> fpi_t fpi_flags)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> - int migratetype;
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
>>> - migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
>>> - __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, fpi_flags);
>>
>> This change is rather undesired:
>>
>> via __free_pages_core()->__free_pages_ok() we can easily end up here with order=MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
>
> Do you have a concrete example? PMD THP on x86_64 is pageblock_order.
> We do not have PMD level mTHP yet. Any other possible source?
>
>>
>> What your new code will do is split this perfectly reasonable MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk via split_large_buddy() into pageblock-sized chunks, and let the buddy merging logic undo our unnecessary splitting.
>>
>> Is there a way to avoid this and just process the whole MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk like we used to?
>
> Probably split_large_buddy() can check the migratetypes of the to-be-freed
> page, if order > pageblock_order. If all migratetypes are the same, the page
> can be freed at MAX_PAGE_ORDER, otherwise pageblock_order.
Thinking about this: why do we care about the migratetype?
We only have to fallback to pageblocks if any pageblock is
"MIGRATE_ISOLATE" (and maybe MIGRATE_CMA), but not all. Otherwise, we
can just ignore the migratetype (or rather overwrite it)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-14 3:54 [PATCH mm-unstable v2 0/3] mm/hugetlb: alloc/free gigantic folios Yu Zhao
2024-08-14 3:54 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 1/3] mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 8:21 ` Yu Liao
2024-08-22 17:25 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-22 17:23 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 18:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-02 17:02 ` Yu Zhao
2024-11-19 15:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-19 16:12 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-19 16:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-19 16:31 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-11-19 16:41 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-19 16:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-19 16:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 15:55 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-20 16:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 16:46 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-14 3:54 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 2/3] mm/cma: add cma_{alloc,free}_folio() Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 17:24 ` Yu Zhao
2024-09-02 17:04 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-14 3:54 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 3/3] mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP for gigantic folios Yu Zhao
2024-08-16 15:23 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-16 16:02 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-16 16:30 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-30 17:55 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 0/3] mm/hugetlb: alloc/free " jane.chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1a77f16b-d637-40b4-bf47-a8236729a0ca@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).