From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-new v3] mm: mincore: use per-vma lock during page table walk
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:50:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ddf7304-70d9-4e35-935a-9d622b022e4f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9da6298e-485a-41af-a42f-7dd05c571125@kernel.org>
On 9/16/2026 2:33 PM, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 9/16/26 06:31, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> do_mincore() performs a read-only, per-VMA residency query,
>> making it a good candidate for per-VMA locking. Convert it
>> to acquire the per-VMA lock, thereby reducing contention on
>> the per-MM mmap_lock.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - add vma_assert_locked, update changelog/comment, per David
>
> It likely was Lorenzo :)
>
Oh, I'm completely blind :)
>> - Add RB
>> v2, (RESEND):
>> - using new vma_start_read_unlocked() API, suggestted by Pedro Falcato
>> v1:
>> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260701144047.3786939-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
>>
>> mm/mincore.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
>> index c086836bc4bc..0fe50f8a7e62 100644
>> --- a/mm/mincore.c
>> +++ b/mm/mincore.c
>> @@ -235,24 +235,22 @@ static const struct mm_walk_ops mincore_walk_ops = {
>> .pmd_entry = mincore_pte_range,
>> .pte_hole = mincore_unmapped_range,
>> .hugetlb_entry = mincore_hugetlb,
>> - .walk_lock = PGWALK_RDLOCK,
>> + .walk_lock = PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY,
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> * Do a chunk of "sys_mincore()". We've already checked
>> - * all the arguments, we hold the mmap semaphore: we should
>> + * all the arguments, we hold the VMA read lock: we should
>> * just return the amount of info we're asked for.
>> */
>> -static long do_mincore(unsigned long addr, unsigned long pages, unsigned char *vec)
>> +static long do_mincore(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> + unsigned long pages, unsigned char *vec)
>> {
>> - struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> - unsigned long end;
>> + unsigned long end = min(vma->vm_end, addr + (pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> int err;
>>
>> - vma = vma_lookup(current->mm, addr);
>> - if (!vma)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - end = min(vma->vm_end, addr + (pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + vma_assert_locked(vma);
>
> I think Lorenzo asked whether we should do that. But the walk_page_vma() further
> below would already verify that due to PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY (see
> process_vma_walk_lock) so not sure if that's really required here.
I misunderstood Lorenzo's intention, which has already been verified
through the PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY check. I don't think it has much
value, but adding it doesn't do any harm.
>
> AFAIKS, everything we do in mincore_pte_range() should be compatible with the
> VMA lock, including the swap and pagecache handling.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 4:31 [PATCH mm-new v3] mm: mincore: use per-vma lock during page table walk Kefeng Wang
2026-09-16 6:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-16 6:50 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2026-09-16 11:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-16 12:30 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-09-16 12:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ddf7304-70d9-4e35-935a-9d622b022e4f@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox