Re: [PATCH] VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7

Christoph Rohland
2000-06-04T11:12:10Z

Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> writes:

> Patch #2 indeed had a big bug that made all systems crash instead
> of use swap (missing braces next to a goto), does patch #3 give you
> the same behaviour?

>From a short view #3 looks much better, but one thing is disturbing me:

12 0 0 0 492440 1604 10200 0 0 0 0 104 72356 5 94 1
shmget: Cannot allocate memory
9 2 1 8992 610136 148 13840 0 1798 3 452 1581 83181 0 90 9

it begins swapping with 490MB free and fails to allocate a shm segment?

Greetings
Christoph