Re: [PATCH] VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7

Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07T14:17:26Z

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 04:11:20PM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote:
>
> But for persistence we now have the shm dentries (We will have at
> least. I am planning to reuse the ramfs directory handling for shm
> fs. This locks the dentries into the cache for persistence).
>
> Couldn't we use this to get the desired behaviour?

No, the dentries make things neat for the VFS but they don't help
the VM at all.

Cheers,
Stephen