Re: vmtruncate question

Andrew Morton
2000-07-14T12:57:01Z

"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 01:53:44AM +0000, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The flushes which surround the second call to zap_page_range()
> > would appear to be flushing more memory than is to be
> > zapped. Is this correct, or should it be:
>
> Yes, I noticed that too: I think you're right.

OK, thanks. I'll implement this in the changes which are part of the
low-lat patch and send it off to LT tonight. If he says "no
low-latency" then I'll make sure this issue isn't forgotten about.