Re: 2.5.38-mm2 [PATCH]

Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-24T10:24:28Z

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:41:09PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:15:59 +0530
> Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Later I will submit a full rcu_ltimer patch that contains
> > the call_rcu_preempt() interface which can be useful for
> > module unloading and the likes. This doesn't affect
> > the non-preemption path.
>
> You don't need this: I've dropped the requirement for module
> unload.

Isn't wait_for_later() similar to synchornize_kernel() or has the
entire module unloading design been changed since ?

Thanks
--
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.