public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:21:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040218222138.A14585@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040218150607.GE1269@us.ibm.com>; from paulmck@us.ibm.com on Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:06:07AM -0800

> The sys_call_table stuff was under #ifdef, and was intended for
> use by a research project that was later put out of its misery.
> This stuff has since been removed from the source tree.
> 
> As to the evilish tricks with lowlevel MM code, the whole point
> of the mmap_invalidate_range() patch is to be able to rid GPFS
> of exactly these evilish tricks.

It didn;t look like that.

Really Paul, the GPL is pretty clear on the derived work thing,
and when you need changes to the core kernel and all kinds of nasty
hacks it's pretty clear it is a derived work.

And it's up to IBM anyway to show it's not a derived work, which is
pretty hard IMHO.

I don't understand why IBM is pushing this dubious change right now,
GPL violation and thus copyright violation issues in Linux is the
last thing IBM wants to see in the press with the current mess going
on, right?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-18 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-16 19:09 Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-17  2:31 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-17  7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-17 12:40   ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18  0:19     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 12:51       ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-18 14:00         ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 21:10           ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-18 15:06             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 22:21               ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-02-18 22:51                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 23:00                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-18 16:21                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 23:32                     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 12:32                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-19 18:56                         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 19:01                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-19 13:04                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20  3:17                             ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-20 21:46                               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-19  0:28                     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 18:36                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 12:31                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-19  9:11                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 18:32                           ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-19 18:38                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-19 19:16                             ` viro
2004-02-19 16:15                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 18:59                         ` Tim Bird
2004-02-20  1:27                       ` David Schwartz
2004-02-19  9:11                   ` David Weinehall
2004-02-19  8:58                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-04  5:51                       ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-19 10:29                   ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-19  9:00                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 11:11                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-19 11:53                       ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-18 18:04         ` Tim Bird
2004-02-19 20:56       ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-19 22:06         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-02-19 22:31           ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-19 16:42             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20  2:06               ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-19 19:47                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20  5:07                   ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-20 12:02                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 20:37                       ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-20 14:01                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 23:00                           ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-20 16:17                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-21  3:19                               ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-21 19:00                               ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-22 23:39                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-25 21:04                                   ` [RFC] Distributed mmap API Daniel Phillips
2004-02-25 19:12                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-25 19:14                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-25 22:07                                     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 22:07                                       ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-25 22:16                                         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 22:46                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2004-03-03  3:00                                       ` Daniel Phillips
2004-03-03  3:15                                         ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-03 13:06                                           ` Daniel Phillips
2004-03-04 18:55                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 21:17                         ` Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-20 22:16                           ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-18 12:12     ` Dominik Kubla
2004-02-17 22:22 ` David Weinehall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040218222138.A14585@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox