From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:46:49 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Lockless page cache test results Message-Id: <20060426114649.5a0e0dea.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060426182323.GI5002@suse.de> References: <20060426135310.GB5083@suse.de> <20060426095511.0cc7a3f9.akpm@osdl.org> <20060426174235.GC5002@suse.de> <20060426111054.2b4f1736.akpm@osdl.org> <20060426182323.GI5002@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Jens Axboe wrote: > > Are there cases where the lockless page cache performs worse than the > current one? Yeah - when human beings try to understand and maintain it. The usual tradeoffs apply ;) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org