From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 23:27:18 +0200 References: <20060508141030.26912.93090.sendpatchset@skynet> <20060508141151.26912.15976.sendpatchset@skynet> <20060520135922.129a481d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060520135922.129a481d.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605202327.19606.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mel Gorman , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com, bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > Anyway. From the implementation I can see what the code is doing. But I > see no description of what it is _supposed_ to be doing. (The process of > finding differences between these two things is known as "debugging"). I > could kludge things by setting MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS to 1000000, but enough. > I look forward to the next version ;) Or we could just keep the working old code. Can somebody remind me what this patch kit was supposed to fix or improve again? -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org