public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] mm: fix pagecache write deadlocks
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:56:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061015115656.GA25243@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160912230.5230.23.camel@lappy>

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 18:44 +0200, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The idea is to modify the core write() code so that it won't take a pagefault
> > while holding a lock on the pagecache page. There are a number of different
> > deadlocks possible if we try to do such a thing:
> > 
> > 1.  generic_buffered_write
> > 2.   lock_page
> > 3.    prepare_write
> > 4.     unlock_page+vmtruncate
> > 5.     copy_from_user
> > 6.      mmap_sem(r)
> > 7.       handle_mm_fault
> > 8.        lock_page (filemap_nopage)
> > 9.    commit_write
> > 1.   unlock_page
> > 
> > b. sys_munmap / sys_mlock / others
> > c.  mmap_sem(w)
> > d.   make_pages_present
> > e.    get_user_pages
> > f.     handle_mm_fault
> > g.      lock_page (filemap_nopage)
> > 
> > 2,8	- recursive deadlock if page is same
> > 2,8;2,7	- ABBA deadlock is page is different
> 
> 2,8;2,8 I think you mean

Right. I've asked akpm to make a note of it (I don't think I can send a
meta-patch ;))

> > +		/*
> > +		 * Must not enter the pagefault handler here, because we hold
> > +		 * the page lock, so we might recursively deadlock on the same
> > +		 * lock, or get an ABBA deadlock against a different lock, or
> > +		 * against the mmap_sem (which nests outside the page lock).
> > +		 * So increment preempt count, and use _atomic usercopies.
> > +		 */
> > +		inc_preempt_count();
> >  		if (likely(nr_segs == 1))
> > -			copied = filemap_copy_from_user(page, offset,
> > +			copied = filemap_copy_from_user_atomic(page, offset,
> >  							buf, bytes);
> >  		else
> > -			copied = filemap_copy_from_user_iovec(page, offset,
> > -						cur_iov, iov_offset, bytes);
> > +			copied = filemap_copy_from_user_iovec_atomic(page,
> > +						offset, cur_iov, iov_offset,
> > +						bytes);
> > +		dec_preempt_count();
> > +
> 
> Why use raw {inc,dec}_preempt_count() and not
> preempt_{disable,enable}()? Is the compiler barrier not needed here? And
> do we really want to avoid the preempt_check_resched()?

Counter to intuition, we actually don't mind being preempted here,
but we do mind entering the (core) pagefault handler. Incrementing
the preempt count causes the arch specific handler to bail out early
before it takes any locks.

Clear as mud? Wrapping it in a better name might be an improvement?
Or wrapping it into the copy*user_atomic functions themselves (which
is AFAIK the only place we use it).

> > Index: linux-2.6/mm/filemap.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/filemap.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/filemap.h
> > @@ -22,19 +22,19 @@ __filemap_copy_from_user_iovec_inatomic(

> > +/*
> > + * This has the same sideeffects and return value as
> > + * filemap_copy_from_user_nonatomic().
> > + * The difference is that on a fault we need to memset the remainder of the
> > + * page (out to offset+bytes), to emulate filemap_copy_from_user_nonatomic()'s
> > + * single-segment behaviour.
> > + */
> > +static inline size_t
> > +filemap_copy_from_user_iovec_nonatomic(struct page *page, unsigned long offset,
> > +			const struct iovec *iov, size_t base, size_t bytes)
> > +{
> > +	char *kaddr;
> > +	size_t copied;
> > +
> > +	kaddr = kmap(page);
> > +	copied = __filemap_copy_from_user_iovec_inatomic(kaddr + offset, iov,
> > +							 base, bytes);
> > +	kunmap(page);
> >  	return copied;
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Why create the _nonatomic versions? There are no users.

This was leftover from Andrew's patch... maybe filemap_xip wants it and
I've forgotten about it?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-15 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-13 16:43 [rfc] buffered write deadlock fix Nick Piggin
2006-10-13 16:44 ` [patch 1/6] mm: revert "generic_file_buffered_write(): handle zero length iovec segments" Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 16:44 ` [patch 2/6] mm: revert "generic_file_buffered_write(): deadlock on vectored write" Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 16:44 ` [patch 3/6] mm: generic_file_buffered_write cleanup Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 16:44 ` [patch 4/6] mm: comment mmap_sem / lock_page lockorder Nick Piggin
2006-10-13 16:44 ` [patch 5/6] mm: debug write deadlocks Nick Piggin
2006-10-13 16:44 ` [patch 6/6] mm: fix pagecache " Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2006-10-13 22:14   ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-14  4:19     ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-14  4:30       ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-15 11:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-14  5:04   ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-15 11:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-15 11:56     ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-10-15 13:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-15 14:19         ` SPAM: " Nick Piggin
2006-10-15 15:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-15 15:57             ` RRe: " Nick Piggin
2006-10-15 16:13               ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-16 15:24                 ` pagefault_disable (was Re: [patch 6/6] mm: fix pagecache write deadlocks) Nick Piggin
2006-10-16 16:05                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-16 16:12                     ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-18 14:25   ` [patch 6/6] mm: fix pagecache write deadlocks Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061015115656.GA25243@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox