From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Drop PageReclaim()
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:25:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070207092517.15071f04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702070612010.14171@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 06:13:48 -0800 (PST) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> Am I missing something here? I cannot see PageReclaim have any effect?
>
>
>
> PageReclaim is only used for dead code. The only current user is
> end_page_writeback() which has the following lines:
>
> if (!TestClearPageReclaim(page) || rotate_reclaimable_page(page)) {
> if (!test_clear_page_writeback(page))
> BUG();
> }
>
> So the if statement is performed if !PageReclaim(page).
> If PageReclaim is set then we call rorate_reclaimable(page) which
> does:
>
> if (!PageLRU(page))
> return 1;
>
> The only user of PageReclaim is shrink_list(). The pages processed
> by shrink_list have earlier been taken off the LRU. So !PageLRU is always
> true.
>
> The if statement is therefore always true and the rotating code
> is never executed.
end_page_writeback() is amazingly obscure for such a short function. For
which I apologise, but on revisit, it's still not obvious how to clean it
up.
It does:
if (!PageReclaim(page)) {
clear_page_writeback();
}
if (PageRecaim(page)) {
ClearPageReclaim(page);
foo = rotate_reclaimable_page(page);
if (foo == 0) {
/*
* rotate_reclaimable_page has already done
* clear_page_writeback()
*/
} else {
clear_page_writeback(page);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-07 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-07 14:13 Drop PageReclaim() Christoph Lameter
2007-02-07 14:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-02-08 21:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 21:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 21:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-08 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-08 22:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-08 22:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-09 0:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-09 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-09 1:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-09 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-11 5:12 ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-07 17:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-02-08 21:19 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070207092517.15071f04.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).