linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	npiggin@suse.de, clameter@engr.sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	jschopp@austin.ibm.com, arjan@infradead.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mbligh@mbligh.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related patches
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:09:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302170950.GD14379@skynet.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070302085838.bcf9099e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On (02/03/07 08:58), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:29:58 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > And I'd judge that per-container RSS limits are of considerably more value
> > > than antifrag (in fact per-container RSS might be a superset of antifrag,
> > > in the sense that per-container RSS and containers could be abused to fix
> > > the i-cant-get-any-hugepages problem, dunno).
> > 
> > The RSS bits really worry me, since it looks like they could
> > exacerbate the scalability problems that we are already running
> > into on very large memory systems.
> 
> Using a zone-per-container or N-64MB-zones-per-container should actually
> move us in the direction of *fixing* any such problems.  Because, to a
> first-order, the scanning of such a zone has the same behaviour as a 64MB
> machine.
> 

Quite possibly. Taking software zones from the other large mail I sent,
one could get the 64MB effect by increasing MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES to be 64MB
in pages. To avoid external fragmentation issues, I'd prefer of course
if these container zones consisted of mainly contiguous memory but with
anti-fragmentation, that would be possible.

> (We'd run into a few other problems, some related to the globalness of the
> dirty-memory management, but that's fixable).
> 

It would be fixable, especially if containers do their own reclaim on their
container zones and not kswapd. Writing dirty data back periodically would
still need to be global in nature but that's no different to today.

> > Linux is *not* happy on 256GB systems.  Even on some 32GB systems
> > the swappiness setting *needs* to be tweaked before Linux will even
> > run in a reasonable way.
> 
> Please send testcases.

-- 
-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-02 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-01 10:12 The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related patches Mel Gorman
2007-03-02  0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02  0:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02  1:52     ` Balbir Singh
2007-03-02  3:44       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02  3:59         ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02  5:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02  5:50             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-03-02  6:15               ` Paul Mundt
2007-03-02 17:01                 ` Mel Gorman
2007-03-02 16:20             ` Mark Gross
2007-03-02 17:07               ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 17:35                 ` Mark Gross
2007-03-02 18:02                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 19:02                     ` Mark Gross
2007-03-02 17:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02 18:45                 ` Mark Gross
2007-03-02 19:03                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02 23:58                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2007-03-02  4:18         ` Balbir Singh
2007-03-02  5:13         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-06  4:16         ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-02 16:58     ` Mel Gorman
2007-03-02 17:05     ` Joel Schopp
2007-03-05  3:21       ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-05 15:20         ` Joel Schopp
2007-03-05 16:01           ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-05 16:45             ` Joel Schopp
2007-05-03  8:49           ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-02  1:39   ` Balbir Singh
2007-03-02  2:34   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-03-02  3:05   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  3:57     ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  4:06       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  4:21         ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  4:31           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  5:06             ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  5:40               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  5:49                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  5:53                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  6:08                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  6:19                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  6:29                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  6:51                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  7:03                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02  7:19                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  7:44                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  8:12                                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02  8:21                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  8:38                                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-02 17:09                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-04  1:26                                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-04  1:51                                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04  1:58                                       ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02  5:50               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  4:29         ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02  4:33           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02  4:58             ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02  4:20       ` Paul Mundt
2007-03-02 13:50   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-02 15:29   ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 16:58     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 17:09       ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2007-03-02 17:23       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02 17:35         ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 17:43           ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 18:06             ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 18:15               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02 18:23                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 18:23                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 19:31                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02 19:40                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 21:12                   ` Bill Irwin
2007-03-02 21:19                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 21:52                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 22:03                         ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 22:22                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 22:34                             ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 22:51                               ` Martin Bligh
2007-03-02 22:54                                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-02 23:28                                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2007-03-03  0:24                                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 22:52                               ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-03-02 22:59                               ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-02 23:20                                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03  1:40                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-03  1:58                                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03  3:55                                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-03  0:33                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-03  0:54                               ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03  3:15                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-03  4:19                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-03 17:16                                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2007-03-03 17:50                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-02 20:59               ` Bill Irwin
2007-03-02  1:52 ` Bill Irwin
2007-03-02 10:38   ` Mel Gorman
2007-03-02 16:31     ` Joel Schopp
2007-03-02 21:37       ` Bill Irwin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070302170950.GD14379@skynet.ie \
    --to=mel@skynet.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).