Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA, take 2.

Christoph Lameter
2007-06-14T06:00:51Z

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:

> If we do that, then slab.h needs a bit of reordering (as we can't use the
> existing CONFIG_NUMA ifdefs that exist in slab.h, which the previous
> patches built on), which makes the patch a bit more invasive.

I guess we should create include/linux/slob_def.h analoguous to
include/linux/slab_def and move the definitions for this into the *_def
files.