Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA, take 2.

Christoph Lameter
2007-06-14T06:01:19Z

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:

> Yes, this is what I had originally. Matt wants to go the other way,
> having the _node variants always defined, and having the non-node
> variants simply wrap in to them.
>
> Doing that only for SLOB makes slab.h a bit messy. We could presumably
> switch to that sort of behaviour across the board, but that would cause a
> bit of churn in SLAB, so it's probably something we want to avoid.

Yes please move the functionality to include/linux/slob_def.h.