Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

Ingo Molnar
2007-08-07T07:05:21Z

* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Ingo's latest 'not quite noatime' seems to cure mutt/tmpwatch so it
> > might finally make sense to do so.
>
> Do we report max(ctime, mtime) as the atime by default when noatime is
> set or do we still need that to be done?

noatime is unchanged by my patch (it is not the same as the 'improved
relatime' mode my patch activates), but it would make sense to do your
change, independently.

Ingo