From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: clameter@sgi.com
Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, wli@holomorphy.com, melgor@ie.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, agl@us.ibm.com,
pj@sgi.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:44:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806164410.GO15714@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070806164055.GN15714@us.ibm.com>
With the previous 3 patches in this series applied, if a process is in a
constrained cpuset, and tries to grow the hugetlb pool, hugepages may be
allocated on nodes outside of the process' cpuset. More concretely,
growing the pool via
echo some_value > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
interleaves across all nodes with memory such that hugepage allocations
occur on nodes outside the cpuset. Similarly, this process is able to
change the values in values in
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/nr_hugepages, even when X is not in the
cpuset. This directly violates the isolation that cpusets is supposed to
guarantee.
For pool growth: fix the sysctl case by only interleaving across the
nodes in current's cpuset; fix the sysfs attribute case by verifying the
requested node is in current's cpuset. For pool shrinking: both cases
are mostly already covered by the cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall() check
in dequeue_huge_page_node(), but make sure that we only iterate over the
cpusets's nodes in try_to_free_low().
Before:
Trying to resize the pool back to 100 from the top cpuset
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 100
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 0
Done. 100 free
/cpuset/set1 /cpuset ~
Trying to resize the pool to 200 from a cpuset restricted to node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 150
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 50
Done. 200 free
Trying to shrink the pool on node 0 down to 0 from a cpuset restricted
to node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 150
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 0
Done. 150 free
After:
Trying to resize the pool back to 100 from the top cpuset
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 100
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 0
Done. 100 free
/cpuset/set1 /cpuset ~
Trying to resize the pool to 200 from a cpuset restricted to node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 200
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 0
Done. 200 free
Trying to grow the pool on node 0 up to 50 from a cpuset restricted to
node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Free: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Free: 200
Node 0 HugePages_Free: 0
Done. 200 free
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 09ad639..af07a0b 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -181,6 +181,10 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
for_each_node_state(i, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hugepage_freelists[i]);
+ /*
+ * at boot-time, interleave across all available nodes as there
+ * is not any corresponding cpuset/process
+ */
pol = mpol_new(MPOL_INTERLEAVE, &node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
if (IS_ERR(pol))
goto quit;
@@ -258,7 +262,7 @@ static void try_to_free_low(unsigned long count)
{
int i;
- for_each_node_state(i, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_mask(i, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
try_to_free_low_node(i, count);
if (count >= nr_huge_pages)
return;
@@ -278,7 +282,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(unsigned long count)
{
struct mempolicy *pol;
- pol = mpol_new(MPOL_INTERLEAVE, &node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
+ pol = mpol_new(MPOL_INTERLEAVE, &cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
if (IS_ERR(pol))
return nr_huge_pages;
/*
@@ -286,7 +290,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(unsigned long count)
* process, we need to make sure il_next has a good starting
* value
*/
- set_first_interleave_node(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
+ set_first_interleave_node(cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
while (count > nr_huge_pages) {
if (!alloc_fresh_huge_page(pol))
break;
@@ -368,6 +372,10 @@ static ssize_t hugetlb_write_nr_hugepages_node(struct sys_device *dev,
unsigned long free_on_other_nodes;
unsigned long nr_huge_pages_req = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10);
+ /* prevent per-node allocations from outside the allowed cpuset */
+ if (!node_isset(nid, cpuset_current_mems_allowed))
+ return count;
+
while (nr_huge_pages_req > nr_huge_pages_node[nid]) {
if (!alloc_fresh_huge_page_node(nid))
return count;
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-06 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-06 16:32 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] hugetlb NUMA improvements Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: numafy several functions Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] hugetlb: add per-node nr_hugepages sysfs attribute Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2007-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] hugetlb: interleave dequeueing of huge pages Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:26 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07 0:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 19:37 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-08 1:50 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-08 13:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-06 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: numafy several functions Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:15 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-07 0:34 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 19:52 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-06 20:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07 0:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] hugetlb NUMA improvements Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070806164410.GO15714@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=melgor@ie.ibm.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).