linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: clameter@sgi.com
Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, wli@holomorphy.com, melgor@ie.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, agl@us.ibm.com,
	pj@sgi.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:44:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806164410.GO15714@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070806164055.GN15714@us.ibm.com>

With the previous 3 patches in this series applied, if a process is in a
constrained cpuset, and tries to grow the hugetlb pool, hugepages may be
allocated on nodes outside of the process' cpuset. More concretely,
growing the pool via

echo some_value > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

interleaves across all nodes with memory such that hugepage allocations
occur on nodes outside the cpuset. Similarly, this process is able to
change the values in values in
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/nr_hugepages, even when X is not in the
cpuset. This directly violates the isolation that cpusets is supposed to
guarantee.

For pool growth: fix the sysctl case by only interleaving across the
nodes in current's cpuset; fix the sysfs attribute case by verifying the
requested node is in current's cpuset. For pool shrinking: both cases
are mostly already covered by the cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall() check
in dequeue_huge_page_node(), but make sure that we only iterate over the
cpusets's nodes in try_to_free_low().

Before:

Trying to resize the pool back to     100 from the top cpuset
Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 1 HugePages_Free:    100
Node 0 HugePages_Free:      0
Done.     100 free
/cpuset/set1 /cpuset ~
Trying to resize the pool to     200 from a cpuset restricted to node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 1 HugePages_Free:    150
Node 0 HugePages_Free:     50
Done.     200 free
Trying to shrink the pool on node 0 down to 0 from a cpuset restricted
to node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 1 HugePages_Free:    150
Node 0 HugePages_Free:      0
Done.     150 free

After:

Trying to resize the pool back to     100 from the top cpuset
Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 1 HugePages_Free:    100
Node 0 HugePages_Free:      0
Done.     100 free
/cpuset/set1 /cpuset ~
Trying to resize the pool to     200 from a cpuset restricted to node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 1 HugePages_Free:    200
Node 0 HugePages_Free:      0
Done.     200 free
Trying to grow the pool on node 0 up to 50 from a cpuset restricted to
node 1
Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
Node 1 HugePages_Free:    200
Node 0 HugePages_Free:      0
Done.     200 free

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 09ad639..af07a0b 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -181,6 +181,10 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
 	for_each_node_state(i, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hugepage_freelists[i]);
 
+	/*
+	 * at boot-time, interleave across all available nodes as there
+	 * is not any corresponding cpuset/process
+	 */
 	pol = mpol_new(MPOL_INTERLEAVE, &node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
 	if (IS_ERR(pol))
 		goto quit;
@@ -258,7 +262,7 @@ static void try_to_free_low(unsigned long count)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_node_state(i, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+	for_each_node_mask(i, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
 		try_to_free_low_node(i, count);
 		if (count >= nr_huge_pages)
 			return;
@@ -278,7 +282,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(unsigned long count)
 {
 	struct mempolicy *pol;
 
-	pol = mpol_new(MPOL_INTERLEAVE, &node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
+	pol = mpol_new(MPOL_INTERLEAVE, &cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
 	if (IS_ERR(pol))
 		return nr_huge_pages;
 	/*
@@ -286,7 +290,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(unsigned long count)
 	 * process, we need to make sure il_next has a good starting
 	 * value
 	 */
-	set_first_interleave_node(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
+	set_first_interleave_node(cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
 	while (count > nr_huge_pages) {
 		if (!alloc_fresh_huge_page(pol))
 			break;
@@ -368,6 +372,10 @@ static ssize_t hugetlb_write_nr_hugepages_node(struct sys_device *dev,
 	unsigned long free_on_other_nodes;
 	unsigned long nr_huge_pages_req = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10);
 
+	/* prevent per-node allocations from outside the allowed cpuset */
+	if (!node_isset(nid, cpuset_current_mems_allowed))
+		return count;
+
 	while (nr_huge_pages_req > nr_huge_pages_node[nid]) {
 		if (!alloc_fresh_huge_page_node(nid))
 			return count;

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-06 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-06 16:32 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] hugetlb NUMA improvements Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: numafy several functions Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:40     ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] hugetlb: add per-node nr_hugepages sysfs attribute Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:44       ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2007-08-06 16:45         ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:48         ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] hugetlb: interleave dequeueing of huge pages Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:04         ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:26           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:41             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07  0:03               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 19:37           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-08  1:50           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-08 13:26             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-06 17:59     ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: numafy several functions Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:15       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-07  0:34         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:00   ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:19     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:37       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 19:52         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-06 20:15           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07  0:04             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] hugetlb NUMA improvements Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070806164410.GO15714@us.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=melgor@ie.ibm.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).