From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:34:22 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC) Message-ID: <20070815143422.GA653@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070814142103.204771292@sgi.com> <20070815122253.GA15268@wotan.suse.de> <1187183526.6114.45.camel@twins> <1187186120.6114.56.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1187186120.6114.56.camel@twins> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andi Kleen , Nick Piggin , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dkegel@google.com, David Miller , Daniel Phillips List-ID: > That is his second patch-set, and I do worry about the irq latency that > that will introduce. It very much has the potential to ruin everything > that cares about interactiveness or latency. I proposed a way to avoid increasing interrupt latency in a simple way. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org