Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC)

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:27:25 -0400 "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm going to try adding all the things I've learned into the mix all
> at once; including both of peterz's patchsets.  Peter, do you have a
> git repo or website/ftp site for you r latest per-bdi and network
> deadlock patchsets?  Pulling them out of LKML archives isn't "fun".

BDI should be back in -mm, for the other its in shambles atm, I'll tell
you where to find it when I've put it back together.

I should get myself some time to read on how to push relative git
trees, as I did get myself a kernel.org account.
 
> Also, I've noticed that the more recent network deadlock avoidance
> patchsets haven't included NBD changes; any reason why these have been
> dropped?  Should I just look to shoe-horn in previous NBD-oriented
> patches from an earlier version of that patchset?

NBD has some serious block layer issues, I once talked with Jens about
it and he explained what needed to be done to get NBD back in
shape again, but I could not be bothered to spend time on it.
[ and have since forgotten most of the details :-/ ]

For me NBD is dead and broken beyond repair, it needs a wholesale
rewrite.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>