From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l98GVPoZ028504 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:31:25 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l98Hdxoq376480 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:39:59 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l98HdxTH008316 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:39:59 -0600 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:39:58 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hugetlb: fix pool allocation with empty nodes Message-ID: <20071008173958.GB14670@us.ibm.com> References: <20071003224538.GB29663@us.ibm.com> <20071003224904.GC29663@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, anton@samba.org, agl@us.ibm.com, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On 03.10.2007 [20:55:00 -0700], Christoph Lameter wrote: > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter > > I guess this should be included in 2.6.24? Realistically, I think 1/2 would be sufficient for now. Since Adam's patches have gone in, 2/2 needs to be reworked to account for the new users of node_online_map. *But*, Lee found issues with my patches and Mel's one-zonelist patches, potentially. I'm going to investigate that in the next week and repost the rebased (on top of Adam's patches which will be in the next -mm) patches soon. Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org