linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, mel@skynet.ie, clameter@sgi.com,
	eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 3/4] Mem Policy: Fixup Interleave Policy Reference Counting
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:49:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071012154912.8157.16517.sendpatchset@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071012154854.8157.51441.sendpatchset@localhost>

PATCH 3/4 Mempolicy:  Fixup Interleave Policy Reference Counting

Against: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2

Separated from multi-issue patch 2/2

In the memory policy reference counting cleanup patch,  I missed
one path that needs to unreference the memory policy.  After
computing the target node for interleave policy, we need to
drop the reference if the policy is not the system default nor
the current task's policy.

In huge_zonelist(), I was unconditionally unref'ing the policy
in the interleave path, even when it was a policy that didn't 
need it.  Fix this!

Note:  I investigated moving the check for "policy_needs_unref"
to the mpol_free() wrapper, but this led to nasty circular header
dependencies.  If we wanted to make mpol_free() an external 
function, rather than a static inline, I could do this and 
remove several checks.  I'd still need to keep an explicit
check in alloc_page_vma() if we want to use a tail-call for
the fast path.

Signed-off-by:  Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>

 mm/mempolicy.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: Linux/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- Linux.orig/mm/mempolicy.c	2007-10-12 10:48:03.000000000 -0400
+++ Linux/mm/mempolicy.c	2007-10-12 10:50:05.000000000 -0400
@@ -1262,18 +1262,21 @@ struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm
 {
 	struct mempolicy *pol = get_vma_policy(current, vma, addr);
 	struct zonelist *zl;
+	int policy_needs_unref = (pol != &default_policy && \
+					pol != current->mempolicy);
 
 	*mpol = NULL;		/* probably no unref needed */
 	if (pol->policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
 		unsigned nid;
 
 		nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, HPAGE_SHIFT);
-		__mpol_free(pol);		/* finished with pol */
+		if (unlikely(policy_needs_unref))
+			__mpol_free(pol);	/* finished with pol */
 		return NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists + gfp_zone(gfp_flags);
 	}
 
 	zl = zonelist_policy(GFP_HIGHUSER, pol);
-	if (unlikely(pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy)) {
+	if (unlikely(policy_needs_unref)) {
 		if (pol->policy != MPOL_BIND)
 			__mpol_free(pol);	/* finished with pol */
 		else
@@ -1325,6 +1328,9 @@ alloc_page_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area
 {
 	struct mempolicy *pol = get_vma_policy(current, vma, addr);
 	struct zonelist *zl;
+	int policy_needs_unref = (pol != &default_policy && \
+				pol != current->mempolicy);
+
 
 	cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
 
@@ -1332,10 +1338,12 @@ alloc_page_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area
 		unsigned nid;
 
 		nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, PAGE_SHIFT);
+		if (unlikely(policy_needs_unref))
+			__mpol_free(pol);
 		return alloc_page_interleave(gfp, 0, nid);
 	}
 	zl = zonelist_policy(gfp, pol);
-	if (pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy) {
+	if (unlikely(policy_needs_unref)) {
 		/*
 		 * slow path: ref counted policy -- shared or vma
 		 */

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-12 15:48 [PATCH/RFC 0/4] More Mempolicy Reference Counting Fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-12 15:49 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] Mem Policy: fix mempolicy usage in pci driver Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-12 17:29   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-12 15:49 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] Mem Policy: Fixup Shm and Interleave Policy Reference Counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-12 17:30   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-12 15:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-10-12 17:33   ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] Mem Policy: Fixup " Christoph Lameter
2007-10-12 15:49 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] Mem Policy: Fixup Fallback for Default Shmem Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-12 17:57   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-15 19:34     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-23 16:15       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-23 16:23         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-23 17:32     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-24 13:09       ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071012154912.8157.16517.sendpatchset@localhost \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@skynet.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).