linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mel@skynet.ie,
	eric.whitney@hp.com, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/8] Mem Policy: Write lock mmap_sem while changing task mempolicy
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:24:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712062224.58812.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071206212053.6279.27183.sendpatchset@localhost>

On Thursday 06 December 2007 22:20:53 Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> PATCH/RFC 01/08 Mem Policy: Write lock mmap_sem while changing task mempolicy
> 
> Against:  2.6.24-rc2-mm1
> 
> A read of /proc/<pid>/numa_maps holds the target task's mmap_sem
> for read while examining each vma's mempolicy.  A vma's mempolicy
> can fall back to the task's policy.  However, the task could be
> changing it's task policy and free the one that the show_numa_maps()
> is examining.

But do_set_mempolicy doesn't actually modify the mempolicy. It just
replaces it using essentially Copy-on-write. 

If the numa_maps holds a proper reference count (I haven't 
checked if it does) it can keep the old unmodified one as long as it wants.

I don't think a write lock is needed.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-06 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-06 21:20 [PATCH/RFC 0/8] Mem Policy: More Reference Counting/Fallback Fixes and Misc Cleanups Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:20 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/8] Mem Policy: Write lock mmap_sem while changing task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:24   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-12-06 21:34     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:20 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/8] Mem Policy: Fixup Fallback for Default Shmem Policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/8] Mem Policy: Mark shared policies for unref Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/8] Mem Policy: Document {set|get}_policy() vm_ops APIs Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/8] Mem Policy: Rework mempolicy Reference Counting [yet again] Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/8] Mem Policy: Use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide default policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/8] Mem Policy: MPOL_PREFERRED cleanups for "local allocation" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-12-06 21:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 8/8] Mem Policy: Fix up MPOL_BIND documentation Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200712062224.58812.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@skynet.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).