linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, liml@rtr.ca, lkml@rtr.ca, matthew@wil.cx,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:02:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071214180206.e0325503.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071215010940.GB28613@csn.ul.ie>

On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:09:41 +0000 Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

> On (13/12/07 14:29), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
> > > The simple way seems to be to malloc a large area, touch every page and
> > > then look at the physical pages assigned ... they now mostly seem to be
> > > descending in physical address.
> > > 
> > 
> > OIC.  -mm's /proc/pid/pagemap can be used to get the pfn's...
> > 
> 
> I tried using pagemap to verify the patch but it triggered BUG_ON
> checks. Perhaps I am using the interface wrong but I would still not
> expect it to break in this fashion. I tried 2.6.24-rc4-mm1, 2.6.24-rc5-mm1,
> 2.6.24-rc5 with just the maps4 patches applied and 2.6.23 with maps4 patches
> applied. Each time I get errors like this;
> 
> [   90.108315] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/uaccess_32.h:457
> [   90.211227] in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> [   90.262251] no locks held by showcontiguous/2814.
> [   90.318475] Pid: 2814, comm: showcontiguous Not tainted 2.6.24-rc5 #1
> [   90.395344]  [<c010522a>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
> [   90.456948]  [<c0105bb2>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
> [   90.510173]  [<c0105eee>] dump_stack+0x6e/0x80
> [   90.563409]  [<c01205b3>] __might_sleep+0xc3/0xe0
> [   90.619765]  [<c02264fd>] copy_to_user+0x3d/0x60
> [   90.675153]  [<c01b3e9c>] add_to_pagemap+0x5c/0x80
> [   90.732513]  [<c01b43e8>] pagemap_pte_range+0x68/0xb0
> [   90.793010]  [<c0175ed2>] walk_page_range+0x112/0x210
> [   90.853482]  [<c01b47c6>] pagemap_read+0x176/0x220
> [   90.910863]  [<c0182dc4>] vfs_read+0x94/0x150
> [   90.963058]  [<c01832fd>] sys_read+0x3d/0x70
> [   91.014219]  [<c0104262>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 
> ...
>
> Just using cp to read the file is enough to cause problems but I included
> a very basic program below that produces the BUG_ON checks. Is this a known
> issue or am I using the interface incorrectly?

I'd say you're using it correctly but you've found a hitherto unknown bug. 
On i386 highmem machines with CONFIG_HIGHPTE (at least) pte_offset_map()
takes kmap_atomic(), so pagemap_pte_range() can't do copy_to_user() as it
presently does.

Drat.

Still, that shouldn't really disrupt the testing which you're doing.  You
could disable CONFIG_HIGHPTE to shut it up.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-15  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20071213185326.GQ26334@parisc-linux.org>
     [not found] ` <4761821F.3050602@rtr.ca>
     [not found]   ` <20071213192633.GD10104@kernel.dk>
     [not found]     ` <4761883A.7050908@rtr.ca>
     [not found]       ` <476188C4.9030802@rtr.ca>
     [not found]         ` <20071213193937.GG10104@kernel.dk>
     [not found]           ` <47618B0B.8020203@rtr.ca>
     [not found]             ` <20071213195350.GH10104@kernel.dk>
     [not found]               ` <20071213200219.GI10104@kernel.dk>
     [not found]                 ` <476190BE.9010405@rtr.ca>
     [not found]                   ` <20071213200958.GK10104@kernel.dk>
2007-12-13 22:02                     ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 22:15                       ` James Bottomley
2007-12-13 22:29                         ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 22:33                           ` Mark Lord
2007-12-13 23:13                             ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14  0:05                               ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14  0:30                                 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14  0:37                                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  0:42                                     ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14  0:46                                       ` [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved) Mark Lord
2007-12-14  0:57                                         ` James Bottomley
2007-12-14  1:11                                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  2:23                                             ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14 17:42                                         ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 18:07                                           ` Mark Lord
2007-12-16 21:56                                             ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 18:13                                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-14 18:30                                             ` Mark Lord
2007-12-20 22:37                                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-14  0:47                                       ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mark Lord
2007-12-14 11:50                                     ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-14 13:57                                       ` Mark Lord
2007-12-14  0:40                                   ` [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments Mark Lord
2007-12-14  1:03                                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  4:00                                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-12-15  1:09                           ` QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ? Mel Gorman
2007-12-15  2:02                             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-12-15  5:55                               ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-16 21:55                               ` Mel Gorman
2007-12-17 19:24                                 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-12-18  2:42                                   ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-13 22:17                       ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-13 22:02                     ` VM allocates pages in reverse order again Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071214180206.e0325503.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).