From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:55:24 -0500 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements Message-ID: <20080104115524.7d906f94@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080102224144.885671949@redhat.com> <1199379128.5295.21.camel@localhost> <20080103120000.1768f220@cuia.boston.redhat.com> <1199380412.5295.29.camel@localhost> <20080103170035.105d22c8@cuia.boston.redhat.com> <1199463934.5290.20.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andi Kleen Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Eric Whitney , Nick Dokos List-ID: On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:34:00 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > Lee Schermerhorn writes: > > > We can easily [he says, glibly] reproduce the hang on the anon_vma lock > > Is that a NUMA platform? On non x86? Perhaps you just need queued spinlocks? I really think that the anon_vma and i_mmap_lock spinlock hangs are due to the lack of queued spinlocks. Not because I have seen your system hang, but because I've seen one of Larry's test systems here hang in scary/amusing ways :) With queued spinlocks the system should just slow down, not hang. -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org