From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:48:35 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h Message-ID: <20080110134835.GE5886@elte.hu> References: <20080108211023.923047000@sgi.com> <20080108211025.293924000@sgi.com> <1199906905.9834.101.camel@localhost> <1199908430.9834.104.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Dave Hansen , travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com List-ID: * Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other > > patch set. Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end > > anyway. > > It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of > earlier patches and so its justifiable to put them together to > simplify the next patchset. i'd agree with this - lets just keep the existing flow of patches intact. It's not like the percpu code is in any danger of becoming unclean or quirky - it's one of the best-maintained pieces of kernel code :) Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org