From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:17:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080111114731.GB19814@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080108205939.323955454@redhat.com>
* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> [2008-01-08 15:59:39]:
> Changelog:
> - merge memcontroller split LRU code into the main split LRU patch,
> since it is not functionally different (it was split up only to help
> people who had seen the last version of the patch series review it)
Hi, Rik,
I see a strange behaviour with this patchset. I have a program
(pagetest from Vaidy), that does the following
1. Can allocate different kinds of memory, mapped, malloc'ed or shared
2. Allocates and touches all the memory in a loop (2 times)
I mount the memory controller and limit it to 400M and run pagetest
and ask it to touch 1000M. Without this patchset everything runs fine,
but with this patchset installed, I immediately see
pagetest invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oomkilladj=0
Call Trace:
[c0000000e5aef400] [c00000000000eb24] .show_stack+0x70/0x1bc (unreliable)
[c0000000e5aef4b0] [c0000000000bbbbc] .oom_kill_process+0x80/0x260
[c0000000e5aef570] [c0000000000bc498] .mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x6c/0x98
[c0000000e5aef610] [c0000000000f2574] .mem_cgroup_charge_common+0x1e0/0x414
[c0000000e5aef6e0] [c0000000000b852c] .add_to_page_cache+0x48/0x164
[c0000000e5aef780] [c0000000000b8664] .add_to_page_cache_lru+0x1c/0x68
[c0000000e5aef810] [c00000000012db50] .mpage_readpages+0xbc/0x15c
[c0000000e5aef940] [c00000000018bdac] .ext3_readpages+0x28/0x40
[c0000000e5aef9c0] [c0000000000c3978] .__do_page_cache_readahead+0x158/0x260
[c0000000e5aefa90] [c0000000000bac44] .filemap_fault+0x18c/0x3d4
[c0000000e5aefb70] [c0000000000cd510] .__do_fault+0xb0/0x588
[c0000000e5aefc80] [c0000000005653cc] .do_page_fault+0x440/0x620
[c0000000e5aefe30] [c000000000005408] handle_page_fault+0x20/0x58
Mem-info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 6, btch: 1 usd: 4
CPU 1: hi: 6, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 2: hi: 6, btch: 1 usd: 3
CPU 3: hi: 6, btch: 1 usd: 4
Active_anon:9099 active_file:1523 inactive_anon0
inactive_file:2869 noreclaim:0 dirty:20 writeback
:0 unstable:0
free:44210 slab:639 mapped:1724 pagetables:475 bo
unce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2829440kB min:7808kB low:9728kB hi
gh:11712kB active_anon:582336kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:97472kB inactive_f
ile:183616kB noreclaim:0kB present:3813760kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable?
no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 3*64kB 5*128kB 5*256kB 4*512kB 2*1024k
B 4*2048kB 3*4096kB 2*8192kB 170*16384kB = 2828352kB
Swap cache: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
Free swap = 3148608kB
Total swap = 3148608kB
Free swap: 3148608kB
59648 pages of RAM
677 reserved pages
28165 pages shared
0 pages swap cached
Memory cgroup out of memory: kill process 6593 (pagetest) score 1003 or a child
Killed process 6593 (pagetest)
I am using a powerpc box with 64K size pages. I'll try and investigate further,
just a heads up on the failure I am seeing.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-11 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 20:59 [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 01/19] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 02/19] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 03/19] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 22:28 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 4:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 04/19] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 05/19] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 22:36 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-09 2:45 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 4:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 2:21 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-10 2:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 3:26 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-10 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 2:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 2:37 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 3:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:37 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 6:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:42 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 15:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-11 16:15 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 19:51 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-11 15:50 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-11 16:06 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 7:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:46 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-14 23:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-30 3:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-30 8:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-30 14:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-31 1:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-31 10:48 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-31 10:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-07 0:35 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-07 1:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-07 1:36 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 06/19] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 07/19] (NEW) add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 4:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-09 12:53 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 08/19] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 09/19] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-14 15:28 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 10/19] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 4:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-15 0:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 11/19] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 12/19] scan noreclaim list for reclaimable pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 13/19] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 14/19] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 15/19] non-reclaimable mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 16/19] mlock vma pages under mmap_sem held for read Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 17/19] handle mlocked pages during map/unmap and truncate Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 18/19] account mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 12:51 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-13 5:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 19/19] cull non-reclaimable anon pages from the LRU at fault time Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 4:39 ` [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements Mike Snitzer
2008-01-10 15:41 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 16:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2008-01-11 10:41 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-11 15:38 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 11:47 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-01-16 6:17 ` rvr split LRU minor regression ? KOSAKI Motohiro
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-02 22:41 [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements linux-kernel
2008-01-03 3:44 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 2:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-10 3:14 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-03 16:52 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-03 17:00 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-03 17:13 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-03 22:00 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-04 16:25 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-04 16:34 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-04 16:55 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-04 18:07 ` Larry Woodman
2008-01-04 17:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-07 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-07 19:32 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-07 10:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-07 15:18 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080111114731.GB19814@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).