From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:17:19 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Do not require CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G to set CONFIG_NUMA on x86 Message-ID: <20080118161719.GA5850@elte.hu> References: <20080118153529.12646.5260.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20080118153549.12646.1915.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080118153549.12646.1915.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, apw@shadowen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Mel Gorman wrote: > There is nothing inherent in HIGHMEM64G required for CONFIG_NUMA to > work. It just limits potential testing coverage so remove the > limitation. thanks Mel, applied. Great change - this will trigger NUMA related build (and boot) failures must faster in randconfig testing. Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org