From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:45:25 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Pull request: DMA pool updates Message-ID: <20080129024524.GA20198@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080129001147.GD31101@parisc-linux.org> <20080128170734.3101b6aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080128170734.3101b6aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:07:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > The usual form is, I believe, > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/willy/misc.git dmapool > > Otherwise people get all confused and think it's an empty tree (like I just > did). Sorry! > There were no replies to v2 of the patch series. It all looks reasonable > from a quick scan (assuming the patches are unchanged since then). I haven't changed them, correct. > afaik these patches have been tested by nobody except thyself? I've tested them myself, then I sent them to the perf team who ran the (4 hour long) benchmark, and they reported success. As with many patches these days, they sank into a pit of indifference. Perhaps I need to take a leaf from my former government's book and sex up my patch descriptions a bit. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org