From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:18:02 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory Message-Id: <20080131021802.b591bee8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1201774213.28547.277.camel@lappy> References: <1201714139.28547.237.camel@lappy> <20080130144049.73596898.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201769040.28547.245.camel@lappy> <20080131011227.257b9437.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201772118.28547.254.camel@lappy> <20080131014702.705f1040.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201773206.28547.259.camel@lappy> <20080131020516.be42c495.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1201774213.28547.277.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, mztabzr@0pointer.de, mpm@selenic.com List-ID: On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:10:13 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 02:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:53:26 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 01:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:35:18 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 01:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Implementation-wise: make_pages_present() _can_ be converted to do this. > > > > > > But it's a lot of patching, and the result will be a cleaner, faster and > > > > > > smaller core MM. Whereas your approach is easy, but adds more code and > > > > > > leaves the old stuff slow-and-dirty. > > > > > > > > > > > > Guess which approach is preferred? ;) > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll look at using make_pages_present(). > > > > > > > > Am still curious to know what inspired this change. What are the use > > > > cases? Performance testing results, etc? > > > > > > Ah, that is Lennarts Pulse Audio thing, he has samples in memory which > > > might not have been used for a while, and he wants to be able to > > > pre-fetch those when he suspects they might need to be played. So that > > > once the audio thread comes along and stuffs them down /dev/dsp its all > > > nice in memory. > > > > > > Since its all soft real-time at best he feels its better to do a best > > > effort at not hitting swap than it is to strain the system with mlock > > > usage. > > > > hrm. Does he know about pthread_create()? > > I'm very sure he does. So you're suggesting to just create a thread and > touch that memory and be done with it? > > Lennart? That would get him out of trouble. But it certainly makes _sense_ for the kernel to implement MADV_WILLNEED for anon memory. From a consistency POV. But I don't know that the usefulness of the feature is worth actually expending code on. Heck, after five-odd years I'm still asking every second person I meet "why don't you use fadvise()?" (Reponse: ooooh!) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org