From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:39:11 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS Message-Id: <20080204213911.1bcbaf66.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <6101e8c40801280031v1a860e90gfb3992ae5db37047@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40801280031v1a860e90gfb3992ae5db37047@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ik9saXZlciBQaW50ZXIgKFBpbnTpciBPbGl26XIpIg==?= Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley , James Morris List-ID: On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pinter Oliver)" wrote: > hi all! > > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the > .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time. > > pictures from crash: > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ It looks like selinux's file_has_perm() is doing spin_lock() on an uninitialised (or already locked) spinlock. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org