From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 05/19] split LRU lists into anon & file sets
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:35:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080206193512.77b5f21f@bree.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080130175439.1AFD.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:57:54 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I found number of scan pages calculation bug.
My latest version of get_scan_ratio() works differently, with the
percentages always adding up to 100. However, your patch gave me
the inspiration to (hopefully) find the bug in my version of the
code.
> 1. wrong calculation order
I do not believe my new code has this problem. Of course, this
is purely due to luck :)
> 2. wrong fraction omission
>
> nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l] * percent[file] / 100;
>
> when percent is very small,
> nr[l] become 0.
This is probably where the problem is. Kind of.
I believe that the problem is that we scale nr[l] by the percentage,
instead of scaling the amount we add to zone->nr_scan[l] by the
percentage!
> @@ -1409,7 +1410,11 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri
> */
> zone->nr_scan[l] += (zone_page_state(zone,
> NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l) >> priority) + 1;
> - nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l] * percent[file] / 100;
> + nr[l] = (zone->nr_scan[l] * percent[file] / 100) + 1;
> + nr_max_scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON+l);
> + if (nr[l] > nr_max_scan)
> + nr[l] = nr_max_scan;
> +
> if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
> zone->nr_scan[l] = 0;
> else
With the fix below (against my latest tree), we always add at least one
to zone->nr_scan[l] and always make that increment count later on!
I am still recovering from my trip home (thanks to the airline companies
I spent 25 hours travelling, from door to door), so I may not get around
to actually testing this today:
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2008-02-06 19:23:16.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/vmscan.c 2008-02-06 19:22:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -1275,13 +1275,17 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri
for_each_lru(l) {
if (scan_global_lru(sc)) {
int file = is_file_lru(l);
+ int scan;
/*
* Add one to nr_to_scan just to make sure that the
- * kernel will slowly sift through the active list.
+ * kernel will slowly sift through each list.
*/
- zone->nr_scan[l] += (zone_page_state(zone,
- NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l) >> priority) + 1;
- nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l] * percent[file] / 100;
+ scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l);
+ scan >>= priority;
+ scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
+
+ zone->nr_scan[l] += scan + 1;
+ nr[l] = zone->nr_scan[l];
if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
zone->nr_scan[l] = 0;
else
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 20:59 [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 01/19] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 02/19] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 03/19] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 22:28 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 4:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 04/19] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 05/19] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 22:36 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-09 2:45 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 4:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 2:21 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-10 2:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 3:26 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-10 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 2:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-10 2:37 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 3:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:37 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 6:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:42 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 15:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-11 16:15 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 19:51 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-11 15:50 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-11 16:06 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 7:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:46 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-14 23:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-30 3:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-30 8:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-30 14:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-31 1:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-31 10:48 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-31 10:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-07 0:35 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2008-02-07 1:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-07 1:36 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 06/19] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 07/19] (NEW) add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 4:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-01-09 12:53 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 08/19] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 09/19] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 22:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-14 15:28 ` Mel Gorman
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 10/19] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 4:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-11 15:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-01-15 0:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 11/19] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 12/19] scan noreclaim list for reclaimable pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 13/19] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 14/19] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 15/19] non-reclaimable mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 16/19] mlock vma pages under mmap_sem held for read Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 17/19] handle mlocked pages during map/unmap and truncate Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 18/19] account mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 12:51 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-13 5:18 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-08 20:59 ` [patch 19/19] cull non-reclaimable anon pages from the LRU at fault time Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 4:39 ` [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements Mike Snitzer
2008-01-10 15:41 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 16:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2008-01-11 10:41 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-11 15:38 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-11 11:47 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-16 6:17 ` rvr split LRU minor regression ? KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080206193512.77b5f21f@bree.surriel.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).