From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:43:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] acpi: change cpufreq tables to per_cpu variables Message-Id: <20080213114317.0698a2b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <47B33278.3060408@sgi.com> References: <20080208233738.108449000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20080208233738.427702000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20080212153356.d2be3248.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47B33278.3060408@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mike Travis Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:10:00 -0800 Mike Travis wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:40 -0800 > > Mike Travis wrote: > > > >> Change cpufreq tables from arrays to per_cpu variables in > >> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c > >> > >> Based on linux-2.6.git + x86.git > > > > I fixed a bunch of rejects in "[PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: change cpu freq tables > > to per_cpu variables" and it compiles OK. But this one was beyond my > > should-i-repair-it threshold, sorry. > > Should I rebase all the pending patches on 2.6.25-rc1 or 2.6.24-mm1 > (or some other combination)? > That depends on whether you have other things queued in one of the git trees. If not, against current mainline (which is later than 2.6.25-rc1!) would suit. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org