From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:23:50 -0500 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Message-ID: <20080302092350.684ca7f6@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080302193024.1E72.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080228192908.126720629@redhat.com> <20080228192928.954667833@redhat.com> <20080302193024.1E72.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:35:44 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > I think this patch is very good improvement. > but it is not related to split lru. > > Why don't you separate this patch? > IMHO treat as independent patch is better. Agreed, I should probably pull this to the start of the patch series and submit it to Andrew Morton soon. The arrayification of the LRU lists and pagevecs should probably go into -mm soon, as well. That code is ready and it can be merged independently of the split VM code. -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org