From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@gmx.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] in 2.6.25-rc3 with 64k page size and SLUB_DEBUG_ON
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:45:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080306214516.GB886@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020803061327r2310b23ew6211bc09f9ba25a3@mail.gmail.com>
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > Mount-cache hash table entries: 4096
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: kthreadd/2/0x00056ef8
> > Call Trace:
> > [c00000003c187b68] [c00000000000f140] .show_stack+0x70/0x1bc (unreliable)
> > [c00000003c187c18] [c000000000052d0c] .__schedule_bug+0x64/0x80
> > [c00000003c187ca8] [c00000000036fa84] .schedule+0xc4/0x6b0
> > [c00000003c187d98] [c0000000003702d0] .schedule_timeout+0x3c/0xe8
> > [c00000003c187e68] [c00000000036f82c] .wait_for_common+0x150/0x22c
> > [c00000003c187f28] [c000000000074868] .kthreadd+0x12c/0x1f0
> > [c00000003c187fd8] [c000000000024864] .kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at /home/auto/jens/kernels/linux-2.6.25-rc3/kernel/sched.c:4532!
> > cpu 0x0: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c00000003c187bc8]
> > pc: c000000000051f8c: .sched_setscheduler+0x5c/0x48c
> > lr: c0000000000748b0: .kthreadd+0x174/0x1f0
> > sp: c00000003c187e48
> > msr: 9000000000029032
> > current = 0xc00000007e0808a0
> > paca = 0xc0000000004cf880
> > pid = 2, comm = kthreadd
> > kernel BUG at /home/auto/jens/kernels/linux-2.6.25-rc3/kernel/sched.c:4532!
> > enter ? for help
> > [c00000003c187f28] c0000000000748b0 .kthreadd+0x174/0x1f0
> > [c00000003c187fd8] c000000000024864 .kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68
> > 0:mon>
> >
> > In the code this corresponds to
> >
> > int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
> > struct sched_param *param)
> > {
> > int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, on_rq, running;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > const struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
> > struct rq *rq;
> >
> > /* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */
> > BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> > recheck:
> > /* double check policy once rq lock held */
> > if (policy < 0)
> > policy = oldpolicy = p->policy;
> > else if (policy != SCHED_FIFO && policy != SCHED_RR &&
> > policy != SCHED_NORMAL && policy != SCHED_BATCH &&
> > policy != SCHED_IDLE)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > With slub_debug=- on the kernel command line, the problem is gone.
> > With 4k page size the problem also does not occur.
> >
> > Any ideas on why this occurs and how to debug this further ?
>
> There's no SLUB in the stack traces. Ingo, any suggestions how to debug this?
hm, no idea - is this powerpc? It seems to have hit a atomicity check
due to:
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: kthreadd/2/0x00056ef8
preempt-count 0x00056ef8 is totally out of whack. Serious memory
corruption.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 13:47 [BUG] in 2.6.25-rc3 with 64k page size and SLUB_DEBUG_ON Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-06 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-06 21:07 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-06 21:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-06 21:52 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-06 21:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-06 22:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-06 22:04 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-06 22:07 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-06 22:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-06 22:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-07 12:20 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-07 12:40 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-03-07 12:44 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-03-07 22:18 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-07 22:30 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-07 22:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-12 15:19 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-12 23:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-18 16:44 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-18 17:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-18 17:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-06 22:25 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-07 22:09 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-06 22:21 ` Jens Osterkamp
2008-03-06 21:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-06 21:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080306214516.GB886@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Jens.Osterkamp@gmx.de \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).