From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:54:12 +0000 From: Andy Whitcroft Subject: Re: grow_dev_page's __GFP_MOVABLE Message-ID: <20080317105412.GA3124@shadowen.org> References: <20080312140831.GD6072@csn.ul.ie> <20080313120755.GC12351@csn.ul.ie> <1205420758.19403.6.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20080313154428.GD12351@csn.ul.ie> <1205455806.19403.47.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20080314114705.GA18381@csn.ul.ie> <1205510734.19403.53.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <1205520765.19403.59.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1205520765.19403.59.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Badari Pulavarty Cc: Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , linux-mm List-ID: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:52:45AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 08:05 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 11:47 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On (13/03/08 16:50), Badari Pulavarty didst pronounce: > > > > > > > > > > > > page_owner shows: > > > > > > > > > > > > Page allocated via order 0, mask 0x120050 > > > > > > PFN 30625 Block 7 type 2 Flags L > > > > > > > > > > This page is indicated as being on the LRU so it should have been possible > > > > > to reclaim. Is memory hot-remove making any effort to reclaim this page or > > > > > is it depending only on page migration? > > > > > > > > offline_pages() finds all the pages on LRU and tries to migrate them by > > > > calling unmap_and_move(). I don't see any explicit attempt to reclaim. > > > > It tries to migrate the page (move_to_new_page()), but what I have seen > > > > in the past is that these pages have buffer heads attached to them. > > > > So, migrate_page_move_mapping() fails to release the page. (BTW, > > > > I narrowed this in Oct 2007 and forgot most of the details). I can > > > > take a closer look again. Can we reclaim these pages easily ? > > > > > > > > > > They should be, or huge page allocations using lumpy reclaim would also > > > be failing all the time. > > > > Hi Mel, > > > > These pages are on LRU and clean. In order to reclaim these pages > > (looking at pageout()), all we need to do is try_to_release_page(). > > fallback_migrate_page() does this but fails to free it up. What > > else I can do here to force reclaim these ? > > In other words, caller has a ref on the buffer_head by calling > getblk(). So, try_to_release_page() would fail since buffer_busy(). > These buffers could be holding meta-data (super block, bitmaps etc.) > for a file system. Till fs gets rid of the ref, there is nothing > much we can do. Isn't it ? Cirtainly when fragmentation avoidance was young we did see a lot of this as some of the meta-data was badly marked. What filesystem is this running on? -apw -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org