From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, apw@shadowen.org, sam@ravnborg.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/19] x86: Use kbuild.h
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:15:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080416121550.b31f828c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804161044250.12019@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > * Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Drop the macro definitions in asm-offsets_*.c and use kbuild.h
> > >
> > > thanks Christoph, applied.
> >
> > the dependency i missed was the existence of include/linux/kbuild.h ;-)
> > Anyway:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> Yes sorry this is dependent on other patches merged by Andrew. This is the
> classic case of arch changes that depend on core changes.
Yeah, I tricked a few people that way yesterday ;)
For this series I cc'ed 30-odd people on the core patch
(add-kbuildh-that-contains-common-definitions-for-kbuild-users.patch) and
then cc'ed them individually on the dependent patch (eg,
sparc-use-kbuildh-instead-of-defining-macros-in-asm-offsetsc.patch). So
hopefully it was somewhat obvious what was going on.
In the case of *-use-get-put_unaligned_-helpers.patch it was more obscure
because the core patch
(kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch) came in a lot
earlier so nobody got to see it. That tricked 'em.
Perhaps I should put "depends on -mm's
kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch" in the
changelog. Problem is that I'd never remember to take that out before
sending the patch onwards.
I guess I could add "this depends on a patch which is only in -mm" into
that email somehow.
hm. Oh well, it doesn't happen very often.
Related:
I'm now sitting on things like:
kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch
...
input-use-get_unaligned_-helpers.patch
Strictly and formally, the merge process for these is
a) I send kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch to
Linus.
b) He merges it
c) I send input-use-get_unaligned_-helpers.patch to Dmitry
d) He merges it
e) He sends input-use-get_unaligned_-helpers.patch to Linus
f) Linus merges it.
This is a lot of fuss and there's a non-zero chance that we'll miss the
merge window. So I like people to send along acked-by's for this sort of
thing so I can scoot them along to Linus straight away.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-16 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080414221846.967753424@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20080414221808.269371488@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20080414221846.735656759@sgi.com>
2008-04-14 22:22 ` [patch 10/19] blackfin: Use kbuild.h instead of defining macros in asm-macros.c Mike Frysinger
[not found] ` <20080414221848.428938934@sgi.com>
2008-04-15 8:14 ` [patch 17/19] Use kbuild.h instead of defining macros in asm-offsets.c Martin Schwidefsky
2008-04-15 9:55 ` [patch 11/19] frv: " David Howells
2008-04-15 19:09 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20080414221844.876647987@sgi.com>
2008-04-16 13:01 ` [patch 02/19] x86: Use kbuild.h Ingo Molnar
2008-04-16 14:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-16 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-04-16 19:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080416121550.b31f828c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).